Today’s Headlines
Editor’s Picks
- Yes, Parking — for BikesSpace for 447 opens in Warren
- Temporary Contemporary ArtGallery 5 hosts a class full of ideas
- COM Student Wins Cash, Cruise on Wheel of FortuneAnnual College Week draws BU crowd to see Pat and Vanna
- Hotel Rwanda’s Real-Life HeroPaul Rusesabagina gives Gotlieb Center MLK Leadership Lecture tonight
- Silent, and Excellent, TeachersMED’s anatomical gift coordinator teaches students to honor the dead
More News
Arts & Entertainment
- John Kuntz Sprinkles Dark Humor Through Salt Girl
- Harry Potter’s World Arrives at the Museum of Science
- An Odyssey in Search of Johnny Cash
- One Class, One Day: Art in the Marketplace
- Robert Altman Returns

Paper copy versus digital copy
Absolutely! This is why we are safer with only electronic copies of documents (but properly protected). The same argument applies to credit cards and SSNs. They are vulnerable (and hard to keep secret/private) precisely because they are accessible in their original form. Check what our resident expert in security Leo Reyzin says about this http://www.bu.edu/today/world/2007/09/16/safety-numbers
"Or maybe he never had any original document and it was a vindictive forgery."
Sure, but here again the answer is to use the proper technology that can check authenticity of digital content.
The issue is not that we don't know how to solve some (if not most) of the challenges posed by the pervasiveness of the Internet, the issue is that we as a society are not demanding the necessary changes to allow the deployment of such solutions.
--Azer