• Rich Barlow

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Rich Barlow, an older white man with dark grey hair and wearing a grey shirt and grey-blue blazer, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Rich Barlow is a senior writer at BU Today and Bostonia magazine. Perhaps the only native of Trenton, N.J., who will volunteer his birthplace without police interrogation, he graduated from Dartmouth College, spent 20 years as a small-town newspaper reporter, and is a former Boston Globe religion columnist, book reviewer, and occasional op-ed contributor. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 15 comments on Alcohol Enforcement to Start This Weekend

  1. Thanks for the article. You should also investigate and find out who us responsible for selling advertising space to alcohol companies at BU. I am shocked to see that right in front of GSU there is a huge sign advertising some brand of alcohol. Such ads should not be allowed anywhere on campus let alone in front of GSU.
    Nawal Ahmed
    Alumni and part time faculty

  2. Halt! You are in violation of the Volstead Act!

    Seriously, though, BU Today should run a piece educating people on their rights. Too often I see people intimidated into self incrimination by BUPD and BPD around Allston, all because they don’t know their rights.

    knowyourrights.org

  3. Apparently this past weekend there was a program sponsored by some individuals about the most drunken colleges. They travel across the US filming and posting the videos online. Last week was BU’s turn. You would wonder how come if most of the students know ahead of time why no one will take steps to alert the community. Also, the people involved with supporting events like that fostering illegal underage drinking in college campuses should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

  4. Hi Nawal,
    I certainly agree that it would be much better if we did not have such ads on campus; however, I think the space you are talking about is actually not governed by BU. It is on public property, a bus stop shelter that is operated by the MBTA. BU would have little say or leverage to change the advertising there.

    I really appreciate that BU is taking responsibility for enforcing the alcohol policies, different from some of the other institutions in the Boston area.

    1. Bus shelters (like the one outside the GSU) are owned by the City of Boston. The MBTA banned alcohol advertising on MBTA property in July 2012 due in large part to the advocacy of the Allston-Brighton Substance Abuse Youth Coalition, the SAFE-MA collaborative and with support from the research led by SPH BU professor Mike Siegel. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19890170

      The Allston-Brighton Youth Coalition is currently working to educate city officials about the effects of alcohol ads on underage youth in the hope to ban alcohol advertising on city property. Comm Ave is a thoroughfare for underage youth traveling to and from school every day, not just for college students. And, the more alcohol ads a young person sees, the more likely they are to drink and to binge drink. http://www.camy.org/factsheets/sheets/Alcohol_Advertising_and_Youth.html

  5. Honestly, such harsh enforcement is not going to stop underage students from drinking. What is going to happen, however, is that they’re still going to do it, most likely to an extreme extent, get sick, and not want to call the ambulance or BUPD because they are afraid of getting arrested. I don’t understand this whole policy that intimidates students to call for help if they need it… Sometimes I wish BU was more sensible and took a more light course of action towards drinking other than scaring and intimidating, but that’s just my logic.

  6. I completely agree with G. Even if the numbers may say that there is a reduction in the amount of students sent to the hospital due to police “beefing up” alcohol control, the reality is that students sacrifice going to the hospital when needed in order to avoid the authorities. The parties and drinking won’t stop. As an academic institution, BU should instead teach their students how to be more responsible when drinking, rather than trying to intimidate them.

  7. Zero-tolerance alcohol policies are useless for the same reason that zero-tolerance drug policies and abstinence-only sex education classes are useless. People are going to do these things whether we say they can or not because they have the right to. Allowing responsible drinking is and always will be the better option than uselessly trying to stop it all together.

  8. Massachusetts should adopt a policy like New York’s Good Samaritan Law. It just makes sense.

    We should be supporting people who feel the need to get help for friends instead of scaring students away by threatening arrest.

  9. Throughout history, there have been people banning substances for other people. There were even 2 constitutional amendments in this countries past dealing with alcohol. Quite honestly, in this age group ( late teens, early adults) you are only adding to the mystique by banning and enforcing something. Forget education, remember this is the DARE generation and they have been educated beyond belief. I can only speak as someone who is old enough to have had the pre-Reagan drinking age of 18. I remember only one case of binge drinking in my college. perhaps this was because alcohol was not illicit and we learned our lessons whilst still under our parents roofs. I strongly believe that it is the fatal combination of FREEDOM and alcohol which account for the large amount of alcohol problems on todays campuses. It may be counterintuitive but reinstating the drinking age to 18 or even lowering it to 16 may help this problem greatly. Before anyone talks about automobiles ( the original problem for which the 21 year old age was instituted) I believe that the age of driving should be raised to 18 or 19. Toss that around in your head for a minute

  10. When I came to Boston as an exchange student last year I was shocked to see how students are behaving like European teens at high school. By trying to overprotect the youth (from alcohol, from sex, from responsiblity) parents, schools and the government created American undergrad’s who just don’t know their limit. As Richard already mentioned, I and almost all German students got to know our limits while we were still living at home with our parents. At school I always needed to somehow get home and face my parents the next morning for breakfast. That definately is an incentive not to do the same mistake (too much drinking) over and over again. Now, at university, alcohol is not a big thing, neither to talk about nor to judge someone’s fun factor on. Also, since I was allowed to drink beer and wine when I turned 16, I didn’t start with hard alcohol…

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *