Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 62 comments on BU Class of 2017 a Select Group

  1. The entire Washburn & Lee Families are very pleased that Alexis Washburn has confirmed, June 11th travel arrangements are set, and she is NOW a Boston Terrier! What an amazing Blessing!!!

    1. Good question. They did have the same admissions rate. Kelly Walter says her office received 7,365 applications to SMG and 2,538 applications to SAR.

    1. Facts? They say the facts? Strange how that works.

      The numbers don’t lie — BU is on an upward trajectory. Not sure if I could get in if I applied now, which IMHO is a good thing.

    1. Not really. I’m in the class of 2016 and I’m actually really proud and excited that my school is becoming more selective and therefore strengthening its reputation.

    2. Not true at all. I graduated a few years ago and frankly, the fact that my alma mater’s reputation is increasing rapidly will only help me and my peers in the job market.

    3. At this rate, with each and every passing year the value of your diploma (or future diploma) from BU is increasing, regardless of what class you are in. New BU classes are essentially strengthening the school’s prestige, and in the process, making all BU alums and current students more attractive candidates in employer’s eyes. So, don’t feel stupid, this is benefiting you more than you know!

      1. It does in fact mean this, I am an international student coming from China and every person who I have mentioned BU to has immediately known where it is, what it is, and been really impressed. Everyone knows it as the school thats on the same level as Beida (Peking university). I can only see this as a good thing for future graduates who want to get jobs abroad.

  2. The admissions requirements have become more competitive and the admissions rate more selective, since the incoming Class of 2015. Prior to 2015, Boston University’s Admissions Department advertised that approximately 70% of children of faculty & staff that applied to Boston University were accepted. I’m sure the BU Faculty & Staff Community are very interested in learning the percentage of employees’ kids that were accepted into the Class of 2015, 2016, and 2017.

    If the acceptance percentage is below 25%, which I imagine is the case for at least the Class of 2017, then 100% or 90% Tuition Remission for Employees Children should no longer be advertised as a huge “perk” of employment, since the benefit only impacts a minority of employees.

    Would the University consider increasing the number of employees’ kids that could use Tuition Remission at an institution other than Boston University? Currently, Boston University authorizes 10 children of employees (based on BU Hire Date) to take advantage of this benefit. How about doubling this number to 20 children per year? This would certainly elevate this benefit to a viable “perk” in the eyes of faculty, staff, and potential employees.

    Has employee retention been negatively effected since 2011 (Class of 2015), with fewer employees’ kids being accepted to Boston University?

    M.J. Walsh, MET ’08
    Staff – MET College

    Parent – ENG 2008
    Parent – CAS ’12 & CGS ’10
    Parent – University of New Hampshire 2015

    1. Why should an employee’s child have a greater percentage of getting in? If their application is good, then they should get in. If it’s not, then they shouldn’t.

      The perk is that if your child is admitted, you don’t have to pay (as much) tuition.

      Are you saying you are a staff member at BU to get your kids into college?

      1. You’ve misunderstood Mr. Walsh entirely. His point is not that the admissions rate for employee children should be higher, but that there should be a greater quota available for Tuition Remission to those who have already been granted admission.

        As it stands, Tuition Remission is heavily advertised for BU employees, and Mr. Walsh’s point is that this is somewhat misleading, as the benefit only affects a (very) small number of people.

        1. Thanks Thomas for clarifying the intent of my comments!

          Addressing “What’s question:
          I didn’t initially come to work at BU with the intent of my kids getting the majority of their tuition paid by the University. However, it’s certainly one of the main reasons I have remained a BU employee; 2 sons attended BU and one graduated. This was a savings of approximately $170,000 for 10 semesters at Boston University. I would say my coming to work for Boston University was a pretty smart investment. Wouldn’t you agree?

          1. Here’s further clarification from Kelly Walter:

            “The children of faculty and staff are always given special consideration by BU Admissions. Historically, the admit rate for these students is higher than that of the overall applicant pool. Despite the increased selectivity this year, we offered admission to 66% of the applicants whose parents are employed at the university.”

  3. What a wonderful thing. My daughter will be graduating in 2014 from a terrific school with wonderful opportunities – couldn’t be prouder! Keep up the good work BU!

  4. “Admissions received a record-breaking 52,693 applicants to fill 3,800 seats in the Class of 2017.” – These numbers are always baffling. Since the stated admission rate is 37%, these 52,693 applicants obviously are not competing for 3,800 seats. Someone must explain this anomaly otherwise these statistics that BU publish are meaningless

    1. Here is the reason: The school accepts more students than it has place for because not everyone who receives an acceptance will come to BU. The school has to try to guess what percentage of accepted students will choose BU.

    2. They admit many more students than the seats they have available, assuming a certain percentage of admitted applicants will choose to attend another school.

      1. To this “Duh” and all others who responded with similar statement:

        Your suggestions are probably incorrect. When you look at statistics obtained from College Board or other similar organizations, it always says admission percentage for college XX for the year xxxx is yy. When you look at this number say for MIT, Harvard, Columbia or other famous or not so famous colleges, there number of applicants, total number of enrolled students and acceptance percentage always match. And to you all, in all these colleges (no matter which category they belong to) there is always a big wait list. If you don’t know, look at wait list acceptance letter for any college from a real student and don’t bother posting a comment).
        Also, 37% of total applicants this year would mean about 19,500 students. Which would mean even if 2 out of five accepted student would want to enroll, BU will not have enough space.
        A clarification on these numbers from knowledgable BU administrator or the writer of this article would be appreciated. Thanks.

        1. S. Gosh, you are incorrect and “Duh” is correct. Admission rate is how many stay students are accepted and retention rate is how many of those whom have been accepted choose to go to said University. Schools like MIT/Harvard have high Renton rates b/ most of their accetped students choose to go to said University.

          ps don’t comment if you don’t know these basic things

    3. Because the number if admitted students is much more than 3,800 — the admissions at BU take into account that some may be admitted but choose not to attend because they did not get enough financial aid/scholarship or they were not admitted to their first choice college (within the university)

    4. This acceptance rate calculation is an industrial standard. Other schools use it as a measurement too. Therefore, it won’t be a misleading number, since it is used to compare.

    5. @S. Ghosh — Before you suggest (accuse) school administrators of fudging their admissions statistics, it would serve you well to be better informed. Learn from what others have posted here, rather than get defensive. By the way, it behooves you to know that these statistics you mention from the College Board and other organizations (say U.S. News and World Reports) are actually sourced through — surprise! — the colleges themselves.

    1. CGS needs to be re-purposed like the School of General Studies at Columbia. It should only be for non-traditional students who do not take a direct path to an Undergraduate education. These are students who have had children, served in the military, and worked in business, and they are the ones that CGS should serve.

      1. That’s what the Metropolitan College (MET) is for… it’s non-traditional and evening learning that has some great classes. I believe CGS is still around because of the University’s charter saying something about having a general studies division, but that is really outdated at this point. While some people get a lot out of CGS, I believe that the University would still be much better off without it.

  5. GWU accepted 33% of applications for the class of 2016 and accepted even fewer to the class of 2017, so I definitely wouldn’t say that BU is “more selective” than George Washington. I also wouldn’t compare GW to American. If anything, I’d say that BU is “on par” with George Washington because it is certainly not on par with BC.

  6. @Christine — A school’s admit rate — whether it’s BC’s 26%, BU’s 36%, or GW’s 33% — is only meaningful to a point. It doesn’t necessarily follow that if Jane is accepted at BC, she would certainly get into BU and GW as well. Rational people know this to be true. Why then engage in this silly talk about parity?

    All three are excellent schools with very competitive admissions.

  7. BU comparing itself to NYU or GW when it had one good admissions rating year is silly. It hasn’t even caught up to Northeastern University yet.

  8. I am glad to see that BU has increased in selectiveness but I don’t think its better or even close to as good as a school as BC, NYU, or GWU…but definitely American U! BU does not nearly provide as good an education compared to the other universities I listed. I personally got into BU, GWU, and American. I decided to go to GWU because they gave me the most money so the value for my education was unparalleled. Looking back, I think I made the right decision.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *