• Patrick L. Kennedy (COM’04)

    Patrick L. Kennedy (COM’04) Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 9 comments on Putting the Powerful on Their Toes

    1. Of the 4 students featured, only one was COM (two were CAS and one is an Emerson grad). I agree with PK, I hope you got more than that out of this article.

  1. I’m a BU undergrad and I’ve lived in Woburn for over a decade. Can’t say it’s done great for itself…it was a nice quiet town with the Leukemia scare far behind it.

    People deserve to know that their are areas that could do better, but the water conditions in Boston are incredibly healthy. Actually, my parents performed tests on the esplanade back in the nineties and found areas clean enough to drink out of! And it’s only gotten better! What students should really worry about it Allston water. It’s not Boston water per se…but fact is it’s loaded with heavy metals, pharma-junk, etc…

  2. That’s great about the investigative reporting at BU, but… The water in Woburn is actually quite healthy, as Woburnite stated. In fact, we just published a story last week about how the testing came back that the A Civil Action Superfund site (one of many actually in Woburn itself) is not a threat to the homeowners and businesses in the area. And before that, another settlement was reached with one of the companies from another Woburn Superfund site to help restore environmental aspects to the site. All of the EPA’s reporting on the Wells G&H Superfund site is online. Maybe BU Today should take a look at it. :) – http://patch.com/A-v8tf
    Danielle Masterson, Woburn Patch editor and COM ’99

  3. Hi Danielle,
    I state in the first graf that the wells were closed, so there’s no suggestion that chemicals are in Woburn’s current drinking water supply. But according to the NECIR article (and to my research to make sure I wasn’t passing on incorrect information), chemicals remain in the site. To quote the report that you yourself link in your Patch article: “The groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE). Sediments in the Aberjona River are contaminated with heavy metals such as arsenic. Soil is contaminated with PAHs, polychlorinated biphynels (PCBs), VOCs, and pesticides. People are at risk if they accidentally touch or swallow contaminated groundwater, soil, or sediments in the Aberjona River. The site is located on land that serves as a recharge area for the aquifer from which the Woburn Municipal Wells G & H historically drew water.” I think the good news the EPA is now announcing is that the chemicals aren’t traveling as vapors into the air of neighboring buildings, which is great. I’m sure you know this subject better than I do, and I can understand Woburn’s sensitivity to people’s perceptions about this. Nevertheless, I can’t blame NECIR for (accurately, so far as I can tell) leading with Woburn in order to draw attention to the 25 Superfund sites statewide that are still toxic, some after many years and millions of dollars. The NECIR article, for your reference: http://necir-bu.org/investigations/ma-superfund-sites-remain-contaminated/nearly-30-years-and-1-billion-later/
    Patrick L. Kennedy (COM’04)

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *