• Art Jahnke

    Senior Contributing Editor

    Art Janke

    Art Jahnke began his career at the Real Paper, a Boston area alternative weekly. He has worked as a writer and editor at Boston Magazine, web editorial director at CXO Media, and executive editor in Marketing & Communications at Boston University, where his work was honored with many awards. Profile

  • Jessica Ullian

    Jessica Ullian Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 29 comments on University Council Approves Open Access Plan

  1. Nothing is said in this article about research published in book form; nor about whether BU’s move will be mandatory or not.

    I wonder how those whose publications are more normally in book form – which by and large means non-scientific authors – will fare under the new arrangement. Will projects already under contract with publishers be exempt? If not, I can see no reason why the publishers should continue with the contract, since BU will be creating a “rival” publication against which they will not be able to afford to publish (and which will give them a get-out for axing the contract).

    Presumably works already published will not be included in the open access, or only by arrangement with the publishers, but it would be good to know.

    What selection process will there be to determine whether a book counts as research? For example, a synthesis of information on a subject, or a textbook. Or a biography?

    Turning to journal articles, is it expected that academic journals will continue to accept articles that are also posted free on the University website? Is there enough knowledge of how the journal publishing industry will be impacted by the open-access movement, I wonder? One can envisage well- established authors faring all right, since the journals may be desperate to hang onto their existence by still representing the “best” authors, but will this be true for lesser known authors? At some point it’s to be assumed that academic journals will find they need a totally different model to sustain themselves (and many will presumably not survive).

    I also wonder what impact this open-access move will have on the tenure process, and on the prospects of young BU faculty getting positions elsewhere. If, instead of publishing in academic journals, their work appears on the BU site, validated simply by BU “journal-editors” (who, by the way, will need to be identified, and remunerated, by the University for the immense task of approving, editing, and fact-checking the material that comes to them, tasks currently accomplished by the academic journals), will they have as much credibility as if they had published “outside” their home university? At least until open access becomes established everywhere – and the article is perhaps right that it is unstoppable – they may be at a disadvantage.

    In the longer term, when/if the move to open access has become the norm everywhere, it’s to be presumed that pay-to-view journals will cease business or be absorbed into universities that are willing to foot the cost of supporting them (on the analogy of the Harvard Human Rights Journal, for example). This will necessarily impact parts of the academic book-publishing world, even if most or all books are to be exempted from the open-access requirement. Academic presses that are currently able to support their book-publishing (where capital expenditure happens before revenue) with journal-publishing (where subscription revenue arrives before capital expenditure) will certainly find it harder to sustain themselves. The same will apply to those journals that are owned by learned societies. While it’s probably true that, even taken together, university-press-published and privately-owned journals do not represent the majority of currently available journals, they none the less include many titles that are important in their fields, for example the Journal of Political Economy, the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, History Workshop Journal, the Journal of Biochemistry, etc. etc. Perhaps rich universities will acquire these and publish them free – and be willing to duplicate the postings of articles that are already available on the websites of the writers’ universities.

    Free access is a wonderful thing, from which we all benefit, but it has a very considerable cost. I am sure that the above implications of the decision have been considered by those responsible for making it, but I hope that more information will be made available to us shortly.

    Frances Whistler

    Director of publications, Editorial Institute, BU

  2. As a journalist, I’m all for anything that allows for easier access to content like this. It can be difficult, to say the least, to look up research papers that are related to an article I may be working on.

    However, as someone who’s also a big fan of science, I’m wondering about the criteria that will determine whether papers are published online in this system. As part of the traditional publishing process, papers are peer reviewed. This is an essential step in helping prevent junk or bad science from getting a larger platform than it deserves.

    So, BU must spell out clearly — Will the papers published online by BU be peer reviewed? Should people expect the same level of scholarship from these papers as they would from papers published traditionally?

    BU must not sacrifice scientific integrity in the interest of ease of access. It can do both and must reassure its alumni and the broader scientific community that it will.

  3. It would be the 28th university-wide Open Access mandate worldwide, not the first. But it would be the first for the US, which is a significant breakthrough. The earlier mandates at Harvard and Stanford only apply to certain schools within the university, not (yet) university wide. All those who voted for the BU policy and prepared the way deserve our thanks and congratulations.

  4. I also wonder what impact this open-access move will have on the tenure process, and on the prospects of young BU faculty getting positions elsewhere. If, instead of publishing in academic journals, their work appears on the BU site, validated simply by BU “journal-editors”

  5. I also wonder what impact this open-access move will have on the tenure process, and on the prospects of young BU faculty getting positions elsewhere. If, instead of publishing in academic journals, their work appears on the BU site, validated simply by BU "journal-editors"

  6. Will the papers published online by BU be peer reviewed? Should people expect the same level of scholarship from these papers as they would from papers published traditionally? BU must not sacrifice scientific integrity in the interest of ease of access. 

  7. Thanks for your post. Congratulations to all who voted for this policy and all who paved the way. Is the policy itself online yet? Could someone post the link?

  8. i think is very welcome on the part of the authorities to have allowed access to the scholarly work of the faculty. Th emore information is out more is going to be the use of the information. Abundance feeds abundance. Well done.

  9. What exactly does this vote mean … is all faculty research now required to be open-access, or is this just providing a venue for open-access publication?

  10. I’m wondering about the criteria that will determine whether papers are published online in this system. As part of the traditional publishing process, papers are peer reviewed.

  11. Will the papers published online by BU be peer reviewed? Should people expect the same level of scholarship from these papers as they would from papers published traditionally? BU must not sacrifice scientific integrity in the interest of ease of access.

  12. i think is very welcome on the part of the authorities to have allowed access to the scholarly work of the faculty. Th emore information is out more is going to be the use of the information. Abundance feeds abundance. Well done.

  13. A few universities, like, California University, are taking care of everything for their faculty’s open-access to fee publishing, and in different cases, researchers have incorporated these charges as a detail in their give applications.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *