Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 5 comments on Rwanda’s President Teleconferences with BU Seminar

  1. Great job Kinzer! – Hopefully American students will get to know and learn that not all African presidents are hopeless and lack direction or vision. Maybe for once we an begin a new era of leaders that will turn that continent around back to the direction that it should have been going many years ago before colonization and the deadly consequences that came from it – believe it or not.

  2. A colleague of ours sent us the link to the Rwandan President teleconference with Boston University students. I wonder if any of the students raised questions about Rwanda’s invasions of Congo (1996 & 1998) that has lead to an estimated 6 million dead or his support of proxy rebel groups in Congo which prompted Sweden and Netherlands to withdraw aid from Rwanda. Also, did they question the Rwandan “economic miracle” and how it is built on the looting of Congo’s resources, which lead former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs to state in the New York Times on Dec. 2008 “having controlled the Kivu provinces (Eastern Congo) for 12 years, Rwanda will not relinquish access to resources that constitute a significant percentage of its gross national product.” http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/opinion/16cohen.html

    Were any questions raised about the indictment issued by the Spanish Courts (The same court that indicted Pinochet of Chile) for 40 of Rwanda’s top government officials for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed in Rwanda and Congo? http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/spain-judge-indicts-40-rwanda-military.php

    Did the students ask how it is in a so-called Democratic elections one candidate can win 95% of the votes as Kagame did in the 2003 Rwandan “elections?”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/26/world/rwandan-president-declares-election-victory.html

    We would be intrigued to know if at an institution of higher learning such as Boston University, if the students asked any such critical questions about issues that have been dealt with widely by the Economist Magazine. New York Times editorial board, Several United Nations Reports, Spanish and French Courts, BBC News and of late even CNN. Consolidating all the sources I just mentioned, it would behoove any upcoming student-scholar to look at New York Times Journalist Howard French’s latest piece in the New York Review of Books: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23054

    The above are questions asked in the spirit of open and liberal intellectual inquiry into two of the greatest human tragedies of our time.

  3. Great initiative. Technology is such a powerful tool. Rather than rely on secondary sources, in the form of so-called “Africa experts” that would like the US public to look at entire regions and countries through their distorted lenses, (shining example in the previous post) it is increasingly possible for everyone to get facts from the source. Several surveys have demonstrated that despite the constant negative press on Rwanda, Rwandans are overwhelmingly confident in Kagame’s ability to improve their lives. Anyone who has been to Rwanda y realizes that Kagame has simply done for his people much more than any other African leader. Bitter, self-righteous commentators like French and Prunier can not change the facts on the ground.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *