Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 18 comments on O’Reilly Factors into Alumni Weekend

  1. “Don’t let anyone tell you, ‘You should do this; you should do that.” Thanks Mr. O’Reilly for outlining the very reason I chose not to participate in this event during Alumni Weekend.

    O’Reilly’s belief that boring is what has caused the downfall of journalism is really a sad piece of commentary. Sometimes we need to take a good long look at what has caused us to be in the situation that we find ourselves in. The economy is a good example. Very few people like to study economics, but we need some education about it in order to understand he sub-prime fiasco. This isn’t exciting, it’s necessary.

    Now, if you’ll pardon me while I turn on NPR and the BBC. They may be “boring”, but at least I didn’t spend too much time in the last two weeks worrying about the Boy in the Balloon or Jon & Kate.

    And BU, when you bring Stern back to campus, then I’ll come to Alumni Weekend. Until then, I’ll connect with my friends through Facebook. Oh, and BU Today, I get it – the crowd dug him. They were supportive. They were thrilled to listen. That’s great. Good for them. But, don’t slant the story so much to make it sound like O’Reilly was surrounded by a room full of objective individuals who were dazzled by his expertise and demeanor. He’s a bully and a liar.

  2. Many of us who come from earth where we exist with reality as a political reference not partisan magic slight of hand find o’reilly repulsive in his support of not conservative values, but advnacement lunacy and exploitation of the lay man, using race and freedom as tools to justify wars, greed, and crime

  3. “I drive that show,” he says. “If I have a guest that’s boring, I take it over. I don’t let them say a thing.” When this guy ‘takes it over’ he attempts to silence his guests with noise whenever Fox’s (very apparent) political stance is challenged. This kind of buffoonery is abhorrent, and misrepresentative of professional political science.

    The O’Reilly Factor is NOT a program that provides an objective view of current events/issues at all…

  4. The typical response comments you’d expect.

    Love him or hate him, O’Reilly is extremely successful in the journalism industry. You can’t argue with that. He’s good at what he does.

    I just don’t understand why people feel so constantly threatened by Bill O’Reilly. He’s expressing a viewpoint, just like hundreds of others on the airwaves. I’d bet most people have never even seen his show.

    There’s objectivity for you. Hope these people aren’t journalism majors.

  5. O’Reilly has seen amazing success from the very ideas that he has brought forth in the world. The positions he has supported and the ways that he has spoken about them has brought him worldwide notability. They are his opinions, and he is entitled to them just as equally as any person is entitled to an opinion.

    His success as a journalist and show host only demonstrates that others also agree with his opinions. That’s not a bad thing. Politics are a gray area where those like O’Reilly are able to offer their opinions just as much as President Obama can.

    Don’t hate a man for having an opinion. Prove him wrong if you can. But if he makes valid points just as much as you do, try to understand that you may both be right. Then the spin will stop on both sides.

  6. Do you think you could drool over him a little more? I don’t think you’re totally blinded by your unprofessional celebrity-worshipping yet.

    This is disgusting. BU’s decision to faun all over O’Reilly for alumni weekend definitely factored into my decision to stay in New York–and not answer the phone when BU called for donations this weekend.

    COM has hundreds of amazing alumni out there working as JOURNALISTS, not pundits–as can be seen by those interviewed in BU Today’s Daily Free Press series, which was excellent. I would have much rather heard from a panel of them discussing the future of journalism than a screeching head that’s just tying to boost his ratings and his ego.

  7. “I drive that show,” he says. “If I have a guest that’s boring, I take it over. I don’t let them say a thing.”

    That doesn’t sound like the “fair and balanced” mantra from Fox News?!?

    On further thought, it sounds like a “Talk Show” and not news at all…

    Maybe Bill should go against Ellen in the afternoon, but I bet he can’t dance…

  8. “People who don’t like me are basically ideologues who feel threatened by an opinion other than their own.”
    So either we always agree with what we’re told, or otherwise were pathetic ideologues? Last time I checked, that wasn’t what the media, and journalism as a profession, were supposed to be about.

  9. Bill O’Reilly is not “extremely successful in the journalism industry.” He is extremely successful in the entertainment industry. There’s nothing wrong with that–the left has its own news-based entertainment programs as well (The Daily Show, Bill Maher), and they can be very effective in challenging authority. I’m pretty sure O’Reilly himself would admit as much.

    Anyway, the problem with this article isn’t O’Reilly. It’s that COM offered him a completely uncritical platform to lavish him with praise, and that BU Today followed suit. Yes, BU should welcome all alumni perspectives, including O’Reilly’s, and yes, BU Today has to show support for such decisions. But both COM and BU Today are run by trained journalists, and they should be ashamed of this glib, shallow representation of O’Reilly’s reception on campus. “O’Reilly dodges some [questions], answers others”? How about letting us know which ones he dodged, since we already got all those glowing grafs about his dedication to speaking the truth? Or better yet, how about just rewriting this entire article as a straightforward account of what was asked and said at the event? Guess O’Reilly-ites would find it too boring.

    But BU Today should be kind of boring. It’s supposed to represent a university, not sink to new lows to get page views. I used to enjoy this site, when it actually gave news about interesting research/people/events on campus. But by trying to insert itself into the hot-button issues of the day, all it does is insult readers. If you can’t give both sides to a story, then don’t cover it!

  10. All these negative comments are simply driving home his point: you people feel threatened by him. You can hate all you want, but none of you will ever be as successful as him.

  11. I’d rather see O’Reilly than the misogynistic Howard Stern!!

    But, we should be proud of all successful BU alumni, whether they are liberal loonies or conservative neanderthals. Way to go, BU! Keep bringing us articles about all the great BU alums out there

  12. “When you’re an outsider, you have a more skeptical view,” he says. “And you can uncover things more readily than people who kind of buy the prevailing wisdom.”

    That’s funny, because in 2002/’03, the prevailing wisdom was that the U.S. should divert its combat resources from a war in Afghanistan (a country that had actually harbored terrorists who attacked us on American soil) and instead launch a (practically) unilateral war on Iraq. The prevailing wisdom further stated that we would be greeted as liberators by flower-throwing Iraqis, and that Saddam’s WMDs would be found in the desert. I don’t recall the host of the most-watched cable “news” program being much of a skeptical outsider back then. Now 5,000+ American soldiers are dead, and the Taliban is resurgent in Afghanistan. Some journalist. (Well, at least we had the vast “liberal” media like the New York Times to give it to us straight, right? Oh, wait a minute.)

    O’Reilly is a heck of an entertainer, but he should have stuck to interviewing strippers. It’s a sad state of affairs that entertainment *is* trumping “boring” news.

  13. BU’s decision to host O’Reilly as a guest for alumni weekend, as well as its decision to run this blatantly biased, right-wing propagated bullsh*t makes me want to vomit and is the reason I will never donate a dime to this school.

  14. As a COM alum, I am impressed by all the alumni that we see globally in the TV medium. I’m also impressed by the journalistic values of many who are now being published. This article, however, was a mere COM 101 feature article that had no stance or message other than to give a brief history of O’Reilly and a snippet of his resume. I’d be impressed if the writer had a positive or negative view on what O’Reilly has to say. The one time the writer tries to dig in, O’Reilly again takes control and tells the writer to move on.
    Don’t be afraid of interviewing "successful" alumni. At the end of the day, you’re a journalist that needs to find YOUR voice. Please have more confidence when you write another article. With a figure like O’Reilly, I want to hear more of his crazy ideas than a bouquet of flowers on the table. That’s sugarcoating COM 101!

  15. “Using race and freedom as tools to justify wars, greed and crime.”

    Add religion to your preamble! These have always been the foundations for such acts since man came to be! Wars have been fought because of race, because of religion, because of democracy. To think that you lay blame on this man (see aforementioned quote) for “his view(s)” is nothing short of hypocrisy in and of itself. Just because he sits on the opposite side of the aisle, he is bad. Because you disagree with his views, he is bad. Because he was a successful journalist turned entertainer, he is bad….no I think you are being a tad-bit melodramatic.

    I “AM” a BU alum, and regardless of who they might be or what they represent I stand next to them as a team player, HELL I’ll even go a few rounds of beer pong with the Zinn WHILE I wear my former United States Marine Corps dress blues, but honestly I don’t think he could hang, not with the beer mind you, rather the site of me in uniform, but I’d give him a shot.

    J- (MET 95’)

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *