Dean Moore Quoted on Revised UMC Social Principles

The following article was originally published on December 12, 2019 by United Methodist News. Please read the full article here

Revised Social Principles reflect worldwide church

by Kathy L. Gilbert

December 12, 2019 – The United Methodist Church has a long history of tackling complicated, controversial and contemporary topics such as polygamy, child marriage, abortion, violence and treatment of migrants.

While much attention currently is focused on the church’s stance on LGBTQ people, it is not the only human struggle the church prays about and addresses.

For the past eight years, a diverse group of writers and editors has been revising the denomination’s Social Principles, which since its founding has been an expression of the Wesleyan commitment to social holiness for The United Methodist Church.

The Revised Social Principles crisscrossed continents, was read and studied by thousands and will land in Minneapolis in May for final review and approval at the 2020 United Methodist General Conference.

Review Revised Social Principles

To read the Revised Social Principles in one of seven languages, visit www.umcjustice.org/sp2020.

The 2012 General Conference commissioned the United Methodist Board of Church and Society to revise the Social Principles to enhance its theological foundations, global relevance and meaning, along with its focus and succinctness, said the Rev. Mary Elizabeth Moore, chair of the revision team and dean of Boston University School of Theology.

The revised document was broken down into four sections: creation, economic, social and political communities. Scriptural passages and excerpts from John Wesley’s writings introduce each section.

Moore said the toughest sections to revise were on violence and sexuality.

“People raised multiple concerns about violence, revealing our very diverse United Methodist contexts and perspectives,” she explained.

“For example, people living under the constant threat of violence often see the use of military force differently from those in which the military itself is a major threat to peace or those who are committed to nonviolent resistance.”

Please read the remainder of the article here