Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There is 1 comment on On Foundational Privilege

  1. Hello,

    I applaud this thoughtful reflection on privilege. I largely agree with what is written here although I think we need to go further. I would add that we extend the arena of concern regarding privilege to some of the most disadvantaged persons in any society: those with disabilities, visible and invisible. Often, people with disabilities also experience economic inequality (lack of access to education and work are a causal factor for many) and that the intersections of race, gender, immigration status with disability produce some of the most egregious inequalities, health and otherwise, that exist.

    I would further extend this awareness to those who work and study among and with us–often at great expense and with tremendous stress that impedes or slows performance and reinforces stereotypes on the part of “able-bodied” educators and employers. Much of the language and behavior we engage in as academics serves to dissuade or even keep out people with disabilities from our ranks, our classrooms, and ultimately our professions and fields. In the case of “harder to see” disabilities, such as learning disabilities, psychiatric disabilities, Traumatic Brain Injury Syndrome and many others, the systems of privilege we have constructed often masquerade as “standards.” People who may be just as talented, just as intelligent, and who could make powerful contributions to fields such as public health, are viewed as slower, lesser, or otherwise “ill-equipped” for life in the academy because they have difficulty conforming to systems of education that were designed to meet the needs of those who are (temporarily) not disabled.

    We know now, of course, that with true, flexible, meaningful accommodation, real standards need not be undercut, and many people with disabilities can participate in most of the professions and fields that were hitherto off-limits. But it requires a searching inventory of “what’s working” in higher education–especially at the graduate level– and a commitment to changing the culture of ability privilege that is rife in the academy. Individuals with disabilities themselves should not have to dismantle systems of discrimination themselves.

    As we grow in understanding of the many ways that disabilities affect learning and work participation, it only makes that public health would embrace a wider view of the needs of populations. Disabilities intersect with class privilege, gender oppression, veteran and immigration status, and of course, race and ethnicity. If we are serious about dismantling unearned privilege, adding disabilities to the mix of those issues we refuse to ignore–not just in our areas of practice, but in our education–would be a meaningful step in recognizing what is known, (somewhat inelegantly) as “intersectionality.” I realize this makes things infinitely complex–how can we look at so much inequity and make sense of what is asked? But unless do that, we will miss much of what is holding people back.

    Betty J Ruth,
    Class of 1985
    Clinical Profession, Boston University School of Social Work

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *