Police Shootings Reflect Structural Racism

Posted on: February 5, 2018 Topics: guns, health disparities, health inequities, incarceration, income inequality, police shootings, racism

The deaths of Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, Michael Brown, and other unarmed Black victims at the hands of police sparked a national conversation about racism and policing, from the Black Lives Matter movement to kneeling NFL players. Critics of these protests have attributed police shootings to “bad apples” within police departments, or argued more Black victims die at the hands of police because higher rates of violent crime in Black communities lead to more interactions with police.

But a new study led by School of Public Health researchers finds states with a greater degree of structural racism, particularly residential segregation, have higher racial disparities in fatal police shootings of unarmed victims.

Published in the Journal of the National Medical Association, this is the first study to examine the relationship between structural racism and racial disparities in fatal police shootings at the state level. Even controlling for rates of arrest, the researchers found a strong association between the racial disparity in unarmed fatal police shootings and a range of structural racism indicators, with residential segregation showing the most pronounced association.

“The problem of police killings of unarmed Black victims should not be viewed merely as a problem of flawed action on the part of individual police officers, but more as a consequence of the broader problem of structural racism,” says senior author Michael Siegel, professor of community health sciences. “Unjustified homicide by police should be added to the long list of the public health consequences of societal racism.”

The study used combined data on fatal police shootings of victims not known to be armed from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2017, obtained from the Mapping Police Violence Project database, the most reliable source of data on police shootings.

The investigators then created an index of structural racism at the state level, believed to be the first of its kind. The index includes measures of Black-White residential segregation and disparities in economic status, employment status, educational attainment, and incarceration rates. The index was on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher numbers representing higher levels of residential segregation and greater gaps in the other indicators.

For every 10 point increase in the state racism index, the researchers saw a 24 percent increase in the ratio of police shootings of unarmed victims. Looking at segregation alone, the researchers found the most dramatic association: for every 10 point increase in the state racial segregation index, there was a 67 percent increase in the state’s ratio of police shootings of unarmed Black victims to unarmed White victims.

The association between levels of structural racism and the racial disparity in the shooting of unarmed victims by police held even after controlling for the rate of arrests of Black individuals in a state, and for the overall rate of fatal police shootings of Black victims. “This suggests that the higher rates of fatal police shootings of unarmed Black victims are not merely a result of more interactions between police officers and Black suspects,” says co-author Anita Knopov, a pre-doctoral fellow at SPH. “Instead, our results indicate that in some states there is a systematically different response based on the race of the suspect.”

The authors wrote that there has been scant public health empirical research to understand why Black people are more likely to be killed by police than white people. However, they wrote, there are accessible and validated measures of structural racism in the public health and social science literature.

“We used indicators of structural racism that reflect a long history of racial oppression by institutional practices such as redlining, the creation of exclusionary or sundown towns, mass incarceration, and other forms of racial discrimination,” says lead author Aldina Mesic, an MPH student and research study assistant in community health sciences. “Residential segregation does not occur overnight. It is the direct consequence of a long history of institutionalized racial oppression.”

The authors wrote they were aware of only two previous efforts to develop measures of structural racism at the state level rather than the neighborhood or city level. However, they wrote that the recent NAACP travel advisory for the state of Missouri, where Michael Brown was killed in Ferguson, reflects the perception that laws, policies, and institutional practices can create cultures of structural racism at the state level.

“This research should change the conversation about the problem of police shootings,” Siegel says. “Part of the resistance to openly discussing this issue is that many people feel offended by criticism of people who are risking their lives to protect all of us. Our study suggests that this problem is not simply about the actions of individuals, but about the actions of all of society. Hopefully, reframing this from an individual to a societal problem will pave the way for a meaningful discussion about institutional racism.”

The other co-authors were research interns in the SPH Community Health Sciences Department: University of Miami student Lydia Franklin, Brandeis University students Alev Cansever and Fiona Potter, and Natick High School student Anika Sharma.

Michelle Samuels

Related Profiles:


  1. A really nice study that to my opinion the results of this study should really be implemented to bring the solution of the well discussed kinds of racisms that are happening in the states without pointing fingers to the individuals as this will bring a new topic of discussion but the systems should find the way at least to reduce this historical kind of racism that has been in states for very long time.

  2. This is a fascinating article, I only wish that BU students/employees/staff could get access to read the entire original journal. This would give them the chance to make their own decisions about the results. Also, it would be interesting to see where different states compare to each other on the authors’ segregation scale.

Post Your Comment