 |
Mission Operations/Recovery Status
TERRIERS launched successfully from VAFB on May 18 05:09:47 GMT.
It hit a nearly perfect orbit (550 X 530 km and an inclination of
about 97.72 degrees). To see the TERRIERS position go to the
position page. For a quick update
on the TERRIERS status see the mission operations
log below .
Mission operations for TERRIERS are taking place at
Boston University's
Center for Space Physics.
TERRIERS operations began on 5-18-99 with the first contact of the
spacecraft around 7:07 EDT. Unfortunately, after the first 3 contacts
it was clear that the the spacecraft's attitude control system was
not functioning properly, since the solar array was pointing away
from the sun and the system was nutating. Sometime shortly thereafter the
spacecraft ran out of battery power and effectively went to sleep.
That week a recovery team was formed by NASA/USRA to devise and implement
a plan to wake the spacecraft and get it back to
the original mission. Led by Steve Battel, the team took on several
tasks in pursuing this goal:
- Determine the cause of the ACS problem,
- Assess the state of the system and its ability to wake up, and
- Model the spacecraft dynamics to determine if and when
the solar array will be illuminated due to natural disturbances
- Devise and test a command load that will aide in the recovery of
the satellite.
Within a week or so we had pruned our fault tree down to the lone
cause of the failure: a sign flip in one of the 3 torque coil actuators.
The fix for this is fairly simple given the flexibility of the
flight software.
All the telemetry from the spacecraft indicates that it was
working properly, except for the sign flip. Furthermore,
the system should not degrade much in its current configuration, since
the spacecraft is powered down and in a reasonable thermal state.
The big question is whether the system can reboot itself from this
state. Simulations on our engineering system were run and it
appears there is a good probability the system will reboot.
Unfortunately the dynamics of the spacecraft was not
easy to model, due to uncertainties in TERRIERS' inherent magnetic moment,
center of pressure, and eddy current/hysteresis damping characteristics.
Initially we thought that the gravity gradient torque would tie our
angular momentum vector (and solar array vector) towards the orbit
normal, which is always pointed away from the sun. However, data points
taken by NORAD of our angular momentum direction and spin period showed
that this model was not adequate. Further modeling efforts over the
weeks have not been able to match the data either. However, we could
see simply from the data that TERRIERS was spinning down at a linear
rate and that in about 70 days (late July) from launch, its motion
should become "erratic" such that the solar panel should get
illuminated for periods on the order of 10 minutes.
Based on the analyses described above, we devised and
tested a set of commands which will correct the sign error.
We also modified and tested the TERRIERS ground station
code to include a mode in which we can transmit only, so that we can
upload the commands as soon as contact is established. Furthermore, we
set up another ground station at Poker Flats, Alaska to increase our
coverage.
Through July and August we received no "truly" positive indications
that the spacecraft had booted. We had support from Poker for
about 3 weeks during this time as well. Analysis assuming that we
were tumbling randomly across the sky, indicated that the spacecraft
would be in a power positive position above a ground station once
every few days. This led us to believe that the spacecraft was either
phase locked away from the sun (a small possibility given our
simulations) or something else had failed.
In September, Michael Comberiate at GSFC suggested that the
south pole albedo during Antarctic summer, might be enough to
boot the spacecraft. The idea seemed plausible and preparations
began shortly thereafter to send some equipment down to the
McMurdo ground station to attempt contact in December, 1999.
The TERRIERS, south pole recovery effort took place
between December 15th and December 24, 1999. This was the culmination
of efforts by Michael Comberiate (GSFC), Greg Huffman (BU RF engineer),
and GSFC Wallops and McMurdo personnel. It was sponsored in
combination by USRA, NASA and NSF.
The team assembled and tested TERRIERS ground station specific
equipment at Wallops Flight Facility in mid November. The equipment
was subsequently packed up and then delivered to NASA's McMurdo Ground
Station (MGS). Mike Comberiate and Greg Huffman arrived at MGS on
December 15, 1999 to integrate the equipment into the GS. They were
able to get the system up and running in only a few hours. Thanks to
the excellent support from the McMurdo GS team, they covered nearly 60
passes over the 9 day period. Unfortunately, in all attempts to contact
and receive date from the spacecraft, no sign of a downlink was detected
from TERRIERS. A more detailed report
(
pdf format or
ps format ) of the operations was written by Greg Huffman.
From the operation, we can conclude that the spacecraft did
not boot in response to the Antarctic albedo during the height of
Antarctic summer. This is either because there is not enough energy
coming from the surface or there is something else preventing
the spacecraft from communicating. In his report, Greg presents
a calculation of the albedo, which indicates that there may not have
been enough reflected sunlight for the spacecraft to boot. However, there
should have been enough energy for the transmitter to send a carrier
signal even if the system was in a browned out state. Test data
indicate that this is highly likely to happen. Because this signal
was not detected, it is more likely that there is something else
preventing the spacecraft from booting.
At this point, the probability of recovery has dropped significantly.
Our hope was that the spacecraft was phase locked away from the sun and
that the albedo would have provided the needed energy to allow us to
communicate with it. Since this did not happen, we have some evidence
that TERRIERS is not phase locked away from the sun as previous ACS
simulations suggest. If this is the case, we can conclude that the
spacecraft attitude (solar array position with respect to the sun), is
not the only thing preventing it from communicating with us. Thus,
there is very little hope for recovery. We will continue to automated
passes from the BU ground station, but, at this point, no further actions
are planned.
As of updating this page (1-24-99), we have not reestablished direct
contact with the spacecraft. Below is a summary of the mission operations
to date.
Items are put in reverse chronological order for quick access to the latest information.
| Date |
Time |
Activity |
Activity Details/Status |
| 1-23-00 |
07:03 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 1-23-00 |
06:17 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with
a fake spacecraft in an orbit 180 degrees out of phase with TERRIERS.
This puts more doubt on all the other "possible brief contacts."
|
| 1-11-00 |
21:32 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 1-9-00 |
21:44 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 1-8-00 |
19:23 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with
a fake spacecraft in an orbit 180 degrees out of phase with TERRIERS.
This puts more doubt on all the other "possible brief contacts."
|
| 12-27-99 |
20:17 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 12-26-99 |
07:31 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with
a fake spacecraft in an orbit 180 degrees out of phase with TERRIERS.
This puts more doubt on all the other "possible brief contacts."
|
| 12-24-99 |
12:00 EST |
South Pole Ops |
Greg Huffman leaves MGS. The operation fails to receive any indication
that the spacecraft is alive. TERRIERS hopes for recovery are all but gone.
Automated contacts continue at BU only.
|
| 12-22-99 |
20:17 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 12-17-99 |
19:14 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 12-15-99 |
08:00 EST |
South Pole Ops |
Michael Comberiate (GSFC) and Greg Huffman arrive at McMurdo Station
in Antartica to attempt to contact TERRIERS from the NASA facility (MGS)
there. They set up things in a couple of hours and make their first attempt
later in the day.
|
| 12-16-99 |
21:48 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with
a fake spacecraft in an orbit 180 degrees out of phase with TERRIERS.
This puts more doubt on all the other "possible brief contacts."
|
| 12-14-99 |
21:05 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 12-13-99 |
08:52 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with
a fake spacecraft in an orbit 180 degrees out of phase with TERRIERS.
This puts doubt on all the other "possible brief contacts."
|
| 12-1-99 |
20:55 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 12-1-99 |
07:42 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-29-99 |
07:51 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-26-99 |
17:51 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-23-99 |
21:50 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-17-99 |
19:06 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-17-99 |
08:59 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-11-99 |
21:10 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 11-6-99 |
20:11 EST |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 10-29-99 |
07:09 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 10-23-99 |
22:25 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 10-6-99 |
09:36 EDT |
GS Jammed |
It's discovered that The GS receiver is jammed by an unknown signal
all day. It appears to be internal to the system, but disappears the
next day.
|
| 9-30-99 |
22:56 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 9-28-99 |
09:52 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 9-17-99 |
10:00 EDT |
Recovery Meeting |
The latest data point - taken on 9-14 - shows that the spacecraft
has spun down to a very slow rate and it is estimated to be about 1
revolution per orbit. This is consistent with a gravity gradient lock
or previous simulations showing "erratic" behavior. It is decided during
the meeting we need one more data point and a few other simulations
to determine this. In any case, it is a clear that the spacecraft has
not come up for any length of time in the last 4-6 weeks, our expected
window of opportunity. Automatic contacts will continue at BU, but
no further efforts will be employed at this time unless something turns
up.
|
| 9-7-99 |
13:15 EDT |
Boston GS |
We switched to the transmit only ground station code and a
command load which minimizes power on the spacecraft. The hope is that
by shutting down many of the systems aboard the spacecraft, we will
increase our probablility of making contact.
|
| 8-29-99 |
22:36 EDT |
Boston Signal |
We get a lot of activity on the receiver and bit synch for a couple
minutes, but no link is established.
|
| 8-17-99 |
10:35 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 8-16-99 |
10:39 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 8-10-99 |
01:53 EDT |
Poker Signal |
The GS Mac at Poker indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 8-6-99 |
09:30 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The Bit Synch at the Boston site glitched with the receiver power
for less than a second, but no link was established.
|
| 8-5-99 |
11:42 EDT |
Poker Signal |
The GS Mac at Poker indicates another possible brief contact with
the spacecraft, but no data is transferred.
|
| 8-2-99 |
10:30 EDT |
Poker Signal |
Poker reports a 2dB signal above the noise for one minute at
the appropriate frequency on the last pass. No data was collected by
the ground station computer however.
|
| 8-1-99 |
07:22 EDT |
Poker Signal |
The GS Mac at Poker indicates another possible brief contact with the spacecraft,
but no data is transferred.
|
| 7-29-99 |
04:30 EDT |
Poker Signal |
The GS Mac at Poker indicates another possible brief contact with the spacecraft,
but no data was passed.
|
| 7-26-99 |
08:00 EDT |
Poker Support |
To support the latest opportunity, Poker schedules about
6 contacts a day. We now have about 60-70% of the passes for
the next few weeks.
|
| 7-25-99 |
09:24 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates another possible brief contact with the spacecraft,
but nothing was detected by the operators at the ground station, and
no data was passed.
|
| 7-14-99 |
20:15 EDT |
Boston Signal |
The GS Mac at Boston indicates a possible brief contact with the spacecraft,
but nothing was detected by the operators at the ground station, and
no data was passed.
|
| 7-14-99 |
08:00 EDT |
3rd Recovery Meeting |
The latest data from NORAD shows that we are spinning
down at a rate such that in a week or two we will be slow
enough such that the gyro inertia will not control the system.
This means that TERRIERS will get spotty illumination of the solar
array after this time for several weeks and perhaps longer.
Simulations of the expected start up sequence performed by
Aeroastro are analyzed and a new upload scheme is devised based
on these analyses.
|
| 6-23-99 |
10:00 EDT |
QuikScat Launches |
Poker supports the Quikscat launch and initial maneuvers so
we lose the Poker support for the time being.
|
| 6-17-99 |
10:00 EDT |
SC Status |
An analysis is performed to determine any long term negative
effects that may occur from the spacecraft in its current unpowered
and backwards position. The conclusion is that the system can survive
time scales on the order of 6-12 months in its current situation.
|
| 6-9-99 |
03:00 EDT |
Poker installation |
Passes are now automated in terms of the TERRIERS equipment.
The installation team flys home. The NORAD data shows large inconsistencies
with our model. We are also spinning down quite rapidly and expect to
go into an erratic type motion in a couple months, illuminating the solar
array for short periods of time.
|
| 6-4-99 |
03:00 EDT |
Poker installation |
First passes are run at Poker about 3 hours after team arrives
and sets up the equipment. All the bugs get worked out over the next
couple of days and by the end of 5 days we have a fully operational
system.
|
| 6-4-99 |
15:00 EDT |
Poker installation |
First passes are run at Poker about 3 hours after team arrives
and sets up the equipment. All the bugs get worked out over the next
couple of days and by the end of 5 days we have a fully operational
system.
|
| 6-2-99 |
08:00 EDT |
2nd Recovery Meeting |
Failure analysis is closed and we develop plan to install hardware
up at NASA's Poker flat facility to increase our coverage. A new upload
load is devised to take advantage of a possible opportunity now predicted
by the GSFC models and NORAD data in the next few days. Furthermore, data
comes in today that indicates the spacecraft may have spun up somewhat.
This later turns out to be noise in the data, but it accelerates our work
to get the Poker site up and working.
|
| 5-28-99 |
10:00 EDT |
Failure Analysis |
Simulations and test data all point towards a sign flip in the
Y (spin axis) torque coil actuator as the cause of the ACS failure.
|
| 5-24-99 |
08:00 EDT |
1st Recover Meeting |
First recovery team meeting. The data is analyzed and all systems
appear to check out. Initial dynamic model results
show that the spacecraft is phase locked with the orbit and that it might
never see the sun. The failure analysis branches to 12 possible
faults. We start, investigating possible locations for other
ground stations, analysis on restart scenarios, and continue to
attempt contacting the spacecraft from the Boston GS.
|
| 5-18-99 |
20:14 EDT |
4th Pass |
No contact with the spacecraft. The spacecraft has most likely
run out of power.
|
| 5-18-99 |
10:14 EDT |
3rd Pass |
Uplink commands to try to force the spacecraft into sun pointing
mode and switch to the backup magnetometer. The data for the last
1.5 hours shows no improvement on our power and pointing status.
|
| 5-18-99 |
08:38 EDT |
2nd Pass |
Second contact is picture perfect until the data reveals that
the batteries are draining and we are not sun pointed.
|
| 5-18-99 |
07:09 EDT |
1st Pass |
First contact with the spacecraft. No data is passed, but the link
indicates that the spacecraft is alive and most likely spinning correctly.
| |
|
 |