New Targets to Treat Type 1 Diabetes

Chemist Arturo Vegas receives $2 million NIH grant to develop therapies that intervene at early stage of disease

Arturo Vegas wants to create novel therapies that will either suppress rogue immune cells attacking the pancreas of people with type 1 diabetes or strengthen the pancreas’ defenses against the rogue cells. Courtesy of Arturo Vegas

Type 1 diabetes is rare but devastating. A person’s own immune system attacks the pancreas, destroying insulin-producing tissue and the body’s ability to regulate blood sugar. About five percent of people with diabetes—approximately 1.25 million Americans—have this form of the disease, according to the American Diabetes Association. Unregulated blood sugar can lead to blindness, kidney failure, and death.

Scientists aren’t sure what causes type 1 diabetes, though they suspect that a genetic predisposition, combined with an environmental trigger, causes a sudden disruption in the immune system that causes it to attack the body’s own tissue. The only treatment is a lifetime of careful blood sugar monitoring, with insulin injections as needed.

But what if there were a way to block the immune system before the damage was done, preserving at least some of the pancreas’ ability to produce insulin? That’s the goal of Arturo Vegas, a Boston University College of Arts & Sciences assistant professor of chemistry, whose lab combines biology, chemistry, materials science, and engineering to develop targeted therapies for complex diseases like diabetes. He recently was awarded a $2 million Type 1 Diabetes Pathfinder Award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to pursue the work.

“Most of the therapies today deal with the disease after it’s already there,” says Vegas, a Peter Paul Career Development Professor. “We want to preserve the patient’s own tissue as much as we can. How do we develop technologies that intervene before they’ve lost all of their insulin-producing tissue?

Beta Cells
In type 1 diabetes, the body’s own immune system attacks the pancreas, destroying insulin-producing beta cells, seen here in green. The red stain shows c-peptide, a marker for insulin production. Courtesy of Arturo Vegas

“There’s this very broad range of time when the disease manifests itself,” adds Vegas. “It actually takes time, and it varies from patient to patient.”

Vegas is going to take advantage of this window and create novel therapies that will either suppress rogue immune cells or strengthen the pancreas’ defenses against them.

“Type 1 diabetes is a huge clinical problem, and this is a smart and clever way to approach it,” says Mark Grinstaff, a BU professor of chemistry and biomedical engineering.

The defensive position, which Vegas calls “targeted immunosuppression,” would take existing drugs used to prevent the body’s rejection of organ transplants and tweak them to target specific immune cells.

“We know the immunosuppressants work. They’re just applied in a way that kind of carpet bombs the body,” says Vegas. “What if we can make those drugs a little smarter, and give them a guidance system, so that they’re only going to affect the immune cells that are performing that horrible autoimmune function at the site of the insulin-producing tissue?”

Vegas’ “guidance system” consists of small molecules that are attached to the immunosuppressive drugs and also recognize and attach to cell surface receptors that are unique to insulin-producing tissue. “The drug goes to that space and then remains there so that when the immune cells come to destroy the insulin-producing tissue, the drug can block the immune cells that are trying to do harm,” he says.

Vegas’ other idea is to go on the offense, designing a molecule that seeks out and destroys rogue immune cells before they get anywhere near the pancreas.

“Normally when our immune system gets matured and educated, the bad-actor cells that might target our own tissue are filtered out,” says Vegas. But in type 1 diabetes, the filtering mechanism is broken and leaks out immune cells specifically designed to attack the insulin-producing tissue. Fortunately, these bad cells have a bulls-eye: a protein marking them as pancreas-attackers. Vegas wants to build a molecule that can bind to this protein and either destroy the immune cell or block its action. “If you take out these cells, it’s likely that you won’t harm the rest of the immune system,” says Vegas. “You’re just removing the bad actors.”

Vegas says that his background in biology and chemistry, combined with advanced training in chemical and biomedical engineering in the labs of Robert Langer and Daniel Anderson at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, allows him to study problems from several different angles and see patterns and solutions that may have been overlooked.

“Arturo’s training positions him to ask really difficult questions that can only be addressed by bringing together several fields, and this NIH funding will enable him to perform the critical experiments to test his hypotheses,” says Grinstaff.

Though Vegas is doing basic research, his ultimate goal is to see his work delivered to patients.

“If, at the end of my career, I can say, ‘I developed a technology that was behind that drug,’” he says, “then I will say I’ve had a very fruitful, accomplished career.”

Published

2 comments

  1. I tend to disagree with the premise that most of the research is dealing with it after you have it. Sure the artificial pancreas has made a lot noise lately as the bio artificial pancreas and cell encapsulated therapies are gaining headlines but the vaccine and other hypotheses have been around longer and so have many other preventive theories. So much so that my T1D daughter were starting to think that that was really the only research that was being done. To prevent it. And the others that have already have had it would be left to continue to struggle with it. I know that’s not true but it sure feels like it at times. What I find interesting with that is how would you know if it actually worked since no one is sure as to what the external environmental factors are that set in motion. Some can have the gene they’re whole lives never develop it. So how would you know if it truly then worked or if they were just not exposed to that environmental trigger? I’m not trying to be ugly or hurtful. As a parent of a child with type 1 diabetes I feel for all dealing with this disease. Just curious and asking questions.

  2. I wonder how are you going to predict which subgroup of population is going to develop Type 1 Diabetes and target them ? Does Vegas mean to block the immune system in each and every newborn child as a means to prevent Type 1 Diabetes ?

Post Your Comment