Associate Professor of Philosophy; Director, Center for Philosophy & History of Science; Director, Graduate Placement
Ph.D., University of Notre Dame
- STH 506
Interests: Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Physics; Science, Technology and Values; History of Science
Alisa Bokulich received her Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame’s Program in History and Philosophy of Science. She is the director of B.U.’s Center for Philosophy & History of Science at BU since 2010, where she also organizes the Boston Colloquium for Philosophy of Science.
Professor Bokulich is also an Associate Member of Harvard University’s History of Science Department. She has been the recipient of several grants from the National Science Foundation, including most recently a Scholars Award to support her new book project on the role of idealized models in the Earth Sciences.
Professor Bokulich’s teaching at Boston University includes courses in the philosophy of science; philosophy of physics; gender, race and science; and science, technology, and values.
- Review by Sir Michael Berry
- Review by N. P. Landsman
- Review by Gordon Belot and Lina Jansson
- Review by Dennis Dieks
Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement, co-edited with Gregg Jaeger (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Scientific Structuralism (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science), co-edited with Peter Bokulich (Springer, 2010).
“Maxwell, Helmholtz, and the Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Method of Physical Analogy” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (forthcoming).
“Metaphysical Indeterminacy, Properties, and Quantum Theory” Res Philosophica (forthcoming).
“How the Tiger Bush Got Its Stripes: ‘How Possibly’ vs. ‘How Actually’ Model Explanations” Monist 97(3): 323-340 (2014).
“Pluto and the Planet Problem: Folk Concepts and Natural Kinds in Astronomy” Perspectives on Science 22 (4): 464-490 (2014).
“Explanatory Models vs. Predictive Models: Reduced Complexity Modeling in Geomorphology” in Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspective & Foundational Problems. Dordrecht: Springer (2013)
“Distinguishing Explanatory from Non-Explanatory Fictions”, Philosophy of Science 79 (5): 725-737 (2012).
“How Scientific Models Can Explain”, Synthese 180 (1): 33-45 (2011).
“Three Approaches to the Quantum-Classical Relation: Bohr, Heisenberg & Dirac” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59: (January 2010): 3-28.
“Bohr’s Correspondence Principle,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2010)
“Explanatory Fictions, ” in M. Suarez (Ed.) Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization (Routledge, 2009: 91-109).
“Can Classical Structures Explain Quantum Phenomena?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59(2): 217-235 (2008)
“Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate,” Perspectives on Science 16(1): 103-114 (2008).
“Heisenberg Meets Kuhn: Closed Theories and Paradigms,” Philosophy of Science 73: 90-107 (2006).
“Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics,” (co-authored by Peter Bokulich) Foundations of Physics 35(3): 347-371 (2005).
“Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Quantum Mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3): 377-396 (2004).
“Horizontal Models: From Bakers to Cats,” Philosophy of Science 70: 609-627 (2003).
“Quantum Measurements and Supertasks,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 127-136 (2003).
“Rethinking Thought Experiments,” Perspectives on Science 9: 285-307 (2001).