Boston University School of Law

Law and Politics Reconsidered:
A New Constitutional History of Dred Scott

Gerald Leonard

Boston University School of Law Working Paper 09-38
Forthcoming in Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 34, Summer 2009

Abstract

This essay synthesizes recent writing on the constitutional history of slavery, featuring Mark Graber's Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (2006). It offers a historical and legal analysis of Dred Scott that attempts to clarify the roles of both law and politics in controversial judicial decisions. It joins Graber in rehabilitating Chief Justice Taney's Dred Scott opinion as a plausible implementation of a Constitution that was born in slavery and grew only more suffused with slavery over time. It integrates much recent writing on the social, political, and constitutional history of slavery to develop the context in which the Dred Scott opinions must be read. And it finds that Justice Curtis's celebrated dissent amounted to an unjudicial manipulation of the law, not the judicial masterpiece of historiographical lore, although driver by the higher purpose of striking at the political hegemony of the slaveholding class.

This essay is an unabridged version of a shorter work that is forthcoming in Law and Social Inquiry (Summer 2009).

 

Size: 364 KB
Est. download time @ 28.8K: 12 seconds

Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required to view this paper.
To obtain a free copy, click the button below

Gerald Leonard Contact Information

gleonard@bu.edu
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Ave
Boston, MA 02215

Phone: (617) 353-3138 (office)

This draft can be also found at the link below:

SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH NETWORK