Was Mechanization De-Skilling?
Did nineteenth century technology reduce demand for skilled workers in contrast to modern technology? I obtain direct evidence on human capital investments and the returns to skill by using micro-data on individual weavers and an engineering production function. Weavers learned substantially on the job. While mechanization eliminated some tasks and the associated skills, it increased returns to skill on the remaining tasks. Technical change was task-biased, much as with computer technology. As more tasks were automated, weavers’ human capital increased substantially. Although technology increased the demand for skill like today, weavers’ wages eventually increased and inequality decreased, contrary to current trends.
JEL Codes: J31, N31, O33
Keywords: skill-biased technical change, technology, engineering production function, mechanization, human capital, wage inequality, learning-by-doing
Size: 224 KB
James E. Bessen
James E. Bessen Contact Information
This draft can be also found at the link below: