IP Conversations: Trademark Law’s conversationFundamental Purposes

November 20th, 2015
9:00am – 1:00pm
Boston University School of Law

The BU School of Law hosted a conversation on trademark law’s purposes. Participants read and discussed historical and policy materials. The discussions were led by Robert Bone, Stacey Dogan, Wendy Gordon, Mark McKenna, and Rebecca Tushnet, each of whose scholarship was among the materials of focus.

Participation in the Conversation is open to all faculty and law students, inside or outside BU, who will be expected to do the reading. In addition, we welcome non-participating audience members to listen to the morning discussion. Non-participants need not complete the advance reading.

This was the first of an occasional series of IP Conversations to be hosted by BU Law.

line

The BU Law Review Symposium:Hirschl
Ran Hirschl’s Comparative Matters:
The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law

November 12th, 2015
12:45 – 4:30pm

Faculty Lounge
Boston University School of Law

I. Faculty Lunch: 12:30-1:00 p.m.

II. Symposium: 12:45-4:45 p.m.
Welcome: Dean Maureen O’Rourke, BU School of Law
Introduction: Associate Dean James Fleming, BU School of Law

Opening Presentation:
1:00-2:00 p.m.
Ran Hirschl, University of Toronto Department of Political Science and
Faculty of Law

Panel 1:
2:15-3:15 p.m.
Anna di Robilant, BU School of Law
Tom Ginsburg, University of Chicago Law School and Department of
Political Science

Panel 2:
3:30-4:30 p.m.
Vicki Jackson, Harvard Law School
Katharine Young, Boston College Law School

Boston University School of Law is pleased to continue its series of symposia on significant recent books in law. This year’s symposium focused on Ran Hirschl’s recent book, Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2014). We invited several distinguished scholars to comment on the book. Professor Hirschl responded. We will publish the pieces in Boston University Law Review.

Ran Hirschl is Professor of Political Science and Law and holder of the Canada Research Chair in Constitutionalism, Democracy and Development at the University of Toronto. Comparative Matters is the third and final part of his tri-partite expedition into the intersecting worlds of constitutional law and comparative politics that began with Towards Juristocracy (Harvard University Press, 2004) and continued with Constitutional Theocracy (Harvard University Press, 2010).
Event flyer.

line

Fryer

The Annual Distinguished Lecture:
Racial Differences in Police Use of Force
presented by Roland G. Fryer, Jr.

November 5th, 2015
12:45 – 2:00 p.m.

Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Room 103

Over the past year, several high-profile incidents of police use of force in cities such as Ferguson, New York, Baltimore, and North Charleston have reignited a national dialogue around race and policing. This lecture explored whether there are racial differences in police use of force by using several sources of data: information from several cities and counties concerning police-civilian interactions ending in officer-involved shootings, stop-and-frisk encounters, results of a nationally representative survey of public contact with the police, and information from police commissioners. The lecture discussed the preliminary analysis of this research and evaluate whether there are racial differences in varying levels of force by police and what factors (such as precinct characteristics) may account for any differences.

If you have academic questions about the program, please contact Professor Linda McClain at lmcclain@bu.edu.

About the Speaker
Professor Fryer’s research combines economic theory, empirical evidence, and randomized experiments to help design more effective government policies. His work on education, inequality, and race has been widely cited in media outlets and Congressional testimony. His numerous awards includes a MacArthur Foundation “Genius Grant” and the John Bates Clark Medal: given by the American Economic Asociation to the best American economist under age 40.

About the Annual Distinguished Lecture
The Annual Distinguished Lecture was established in 1986 to bring outstanding legal scholars to Boston University School of Law to present lectures on important legal topics. Revised versions of the lectures are published in the Boston University Law Review.

Selected Papers by Dr. Roland Fryer on Race and Education and on Racial Inequality

Speech by Roland Fryer after receiving the Calvó-Armengol Prize

Roland Fryer, Clark Medalist, 2015 (write up by American Economic Association)

line

The Kleh Lecture: GlennonDouble Government and
the Senate Torture Report

Featuring Michael J. Glennon, the William & Patricia Kleh Visiting Professor in International Law

Boston University School of Law
Barristers Hall

October 29, 2015
12:45pm – 2:00pm

Why has US security policy scarcely changed from the Bush to the Obama administration? Michael J. Glennon challenges the myth that US security policy is still forged by America’s visible, “Madisonian institutions”–the President, Congress, and the courts. Their roles, he argues, have become largely illusory. Presidential control is now nominal, congressional oversight is dysfunctional, and judicial review is negligible. Professor Glennon will detail the dramatic shift in power that has occurred from the Madisonian institutions to a concealed “Trumanite network.”

For more information about the subject of the lecture, read Professor Glennon’s article in The National Interest.

About the Speaker:
Michael J. Glennon is Professor of International Law at The Fletcher School at Tufts University and the William and Patricia Kleh Visiting Professor in International Law at Boston University School of Law for Fall 2015. Prior to going into teaching, he was Legal Counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He has since been a Fulbright Distinguished Professor of International and Constitutional Law, Vytautus Magnus University School of Law, Kaunas, Lithuania; a Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington DC; Thomas Hawkins Johnson Visiting Scholar at the United States Military Academy, West Point; Director of Studies at the Hague Academy of International Law; and professeur invité at the University of Paris II (Panthéon-Assas). Professor Glennon has served as a consultant to various congressional committees, the US State Department, and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

This lecture is made possible through the generosity of Patricia and William H. Kleh (’71), who established the William & Patricia Kleh Visiting Professorship in International Law in February 2011.

Supplemental Materials:

National Security and Double Government (Full Book)
Harvard National Security Journal: National Security and Double Government
Torturing the Rule of Law

line

Fundamentals of Financial Services Compliance

Wednesday, October 14 – Friday, October 16, 2015
Metcalf Trustee Center at Boston University
Presented by Boston University School of Law and The Clearing House Association LLC

A course for financial services compliance practitioners, sponsored by the Graduate Program in Banking & Financial Law at Boston University School of Law, offered in conjunction with a panel discussion by chief compliance officers of major financial institutions sponsored by The Clearing House Association, New York, New York.

The Graduate Program in Banking & Financial Law at Boston University School of Law is pleased to announce its sponsorship of the second annual Fundamentals of Financial Services Compliance, a 2-1/2 day academic program designed to familiarize participants with the basics of and trends in financial services compliance, including financial services compliance structures and heightened emphasis on the compliance function as an important component of risk management in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008-2009.

Regulatory supervision, investigations and enforcement actions have changed the landscape for control functions, including compliance, risk management, and internal audit. This course is designed to provide both an introduction to and a structural framework for those involved with financial services compliance. It provides a unique mixture of the history of the financial services compliance function, practical advice and illustrations from leading compliance practitioners, and an in-depth discussion of supervisory expectations for the compliance function. This is a program designed for bank compliance practitioners beginning or readjusting a career and it will explore the skills, attributes and strategies required for a successful career in senior-level roles. It is also designed for professionals working in or advising other control functions in financial institutions, including risk management, regulatory liaison, internal audit, information technology and corporate governance.

This course is modeled on Fundamentals of Banking Law, a course which has been offered to new banking attorneys for 18 years. It will be taught by faculty members who have coordinated their classroom presentations with other members of the faculty into a cohesive course offering. These faculty experts will remain on site in order to interact inside and outside the classroom with those enrolled in the program. Presentation outlines prepared by members of the faculty will be combined in a single hard copy booklet that will serve as a basis for following each presentation and to which participants in the program may refer in the future.

Fore more information and registration information, click here.

line

Third Annual Workshop for Corporate & Securities Litigation

Boston University School of Law
October 2-3, 2015

This annual workshop brings together scholars focused on corporate and securities litigation to present their works-in-progress. The papers may address any aspect of corporate and securities litigation or enforcement, including but not limited to securities class actions, fiduciary duty litigation, or comparative approaches to business litigation. We welcome scholars working in a variety of methodologies, including empirical analysis, law and economics or other fields, and traditional doctrinal analysis. Participants will generally be expected to have drafts completed by the fall, although work in a more formative stage may also be included. Each author will provide a brief introduction, but most of the time in each session will be devoted to collective discussion of the paper.
Questions

Any questions concerning the workshop should be directed to the organizers: Professor David Webber (dhwebber@bu.edu), Professor Jessica Erickson (jerickso@richmond.edu) and Professor Verity Winship (vwinship@illinois.edu).

line

Constitution Day 2015Book Jacket

Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: For Moral Readings and Against Originalisms by James E. Fleming, Professor of Law & The Honorable Frank R. Kenison Distinguished Scholar

Thursday, September 24, 2015
12:45 – 2:00pm

Barristers Hall, Ground Floor
Boston University School of Law

In recent years, some have asked “Are we all originalists now?” and many have assumed that originalists have a monopoly on concern for fidelity in constitutional interpretation. In Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2015), James Fleming rejects originalisms—whether old or new, concrete or abstract, living or dead. Instead, he defends what Ronald Dworkin called a “moral reading” of the United States Constitution, or a “philosophic approach” to constitutional interpretation. He refers to conceptions of the Constitution as embodying abstract moral and political principles—not codifying concrete historical rules or practices—and of interpretation of those principles as requiring normative judgments about how they are best understood—not merely historical research to discover relatively specific original meanings. For example, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, protecting the fundamental right of gays and lesbians to marry, reflects a moral reading and rejects an originalist approach. Fleming argues that only a moral reading, which aspires to interpret our imperfect Constitution so as to make it the best it can be, gives us hope of interpreting it in a manner that may deserve our fidelity.

To celebrate the publication of this timely and significant book, we invited three distinguished scholars to comment on it. Professor Fleming responded.

Welcome: Dean Maureen O’Rourke, BU School of Law

Commentators:

Gary Lawson, Philip S. Beck Professor of Law, BU School of Law

Jack M. Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment, Yale Law School
Jamal Greene, Vice Dean and Professor of Law, Columbia Law School

Co-sponsored by the American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society

line

Notice and Notice Failure in Intellectual Property Lawmaze

Boston University Law School
September 25 – 26, 2015

In their landmark book, Patent Failure, James Bessen and Michael Meurer demonstrated that “notice failure” lies at the heart of the current crisis in patent law. Without sufficient and timely notice of the existence and scope of patent entitlements, innovators face risk and uncertainty which can hobble investment, transactions, and economic growth. Notice issues, moreover, are not limited to patent law: problems with notice – from the opaque nature of complex statutes to the fuzzy boundaries of many intellectual property doctrines – can lead to public frustration, litigation, inefficiencies, and chilling effects. This conference explored some of the challenges associated with notice and notice failure in patent, copyright, design patent, publicity, trade secret, and trademark law.

Click here for a current conference schedule.

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

Participants

Barton Beebe, John M. Desmarais Professor of Intellectual Property Law, New York University School of Law
James Bessen, Lecturer in Law, Boston University School of Law
Robert G. Bone, G. Rollie White Excellence in Teaching Chair in Law, The University of Texas School of Law
Oren Bracha, Howrey LLP and Arnold, White & Durkee Centennial Professor, University of Texas School of Law
Annemarie Bridy, Professor of Law, University of Idaho College of Law
Tun-Jen Chiang, Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law
Randall Davis, Professor of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Graeme Dinwoodie, Professor of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law, University of Oxford Faculty of Law
Stacey L. Dogan, Law Alumni Scholar Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
John F. Duffy, Samuel H. McCoy II Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
Michael D. Fricklas, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Viacom Inc.
Jane C. Ginsburg, Morton L. Janklow Professor of Literary and Artistic Property Law, Columbia Law School
Wendy J. Gordon, William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Paul R. Gugliuzza, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Keith N. Hylton, William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Bruce Keller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, D.N.J.
Mark A. Lemley, William H. Neukom Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
Stan Liebowitz, Ashbel Smith Professor of Economics, University of Texas at Dallas
Jessica Litman, John F. Nickoll Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
Joseph Liu, Professor of Law, Boston College Law School
Orly Lobel, Don Weckstein Professor of Labor and Employment Law, University of San Diego School of Law
Lydia LorenRobert E. Jones Professor of Advocacy and Ethics, Lewis & Clark Law School
Peter Menell,  Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology Koret, Professor of Law, University of California Berkeley Law
Michael Meurer, Abraham and Lillian Benton Scholar Professor of Law, BostonUniversity School of Law
Suzanne Michel, Senior Patent Counsel, Google
Ruth Okediji,  William L. Prosser Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School
David OlsonAssociate Professor, Boston College Law School
Margaret Jane Radin, Henry King Ransom Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Michigan Law School  
R. Anthony Reese, Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California Irvine School of Law 
Benjamin Roin, Assistant Professor of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management, MIT Sloan School of Management
Pamela Samuelson , Richard M. Sherman Distinguished Professor of Law; Professor of School Information; Co-Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, University of California Berkeley Law
Honorable Patti B. Saris, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
Jessica Silbey,  Professor of Law, Northeastern University School of Law
Henry E. Smith, Fessenden Professor of Law Director, Project on the Foundations of Private Law, Harvard Law School       
Rebecca L. Tushnet, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Fred von LohmannLegal Director, Copyright, Google Inc.
Alfred Chueh-Chin Yen, Professor and Associate Dean of Faculty, Boston College Law SchoolHonorable William G. Young, Judge, U. S. District Court, District of Massachusetts

line

The Frankel Fiduciary Prize Award Luncheon

Honoring David Swensen, Chief Investment Officer,
Yale UniversityFrankel

Friday, September 18, 2015
11:45am – 1:30pm

Barristers Hall, Ground Floor
Boston University School of Law

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard established the Frankel Fiduciary Prize to honor individuals who have contributed significantly to advancing the fiduciary principals in public life. For more information, visit the Institute at www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org.

12:15 PM – Program Start
Welcome to BU: Fred Tung, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs
Welcome to Institute for the Fiduciary Standard Frankel Fiduciary Prize:
Knut A. Rostad, President and Founder, Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

12:25 PM – Interview with Seth Klarman, President, The Baupost Group by
Andrew Golden, President of the Princeton University Investment Company

1:05 PM – Presentation of Frankel Fiduciary Prize:
Jay O. Light, George F. Baker Professor of Administration, Emeritus, Harvard Business School and Knut Rostad

1:20 PM – Acceptance by David Swensen

1:30 PM – Program Concluded

line

bioIP 2015 Faculty Workshop

Thursday, May 7, 2015
Sumner M. Redstone Building

The American Society for Law, Medicine & Ethics (ASLME) is pleased to announce the first annual bioIP Faculty Workshop at Boston University School of Law.

The workshop will offer a unique opportunity for three junior scholars (in their first decade of teaching) to present their work in progress for in-depth critique and commentary by respected senior scholars in the field.

Topics for the workshop are at the intersection of biotechnology/life sciences/FDA and IP (hence, bioIP), broadly defined.

The workshop committee consists of faculty from Boston University School of Law, Georgia State University College of Law, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, and the Loyola University Chicago School of Law.

Authors:
Liza S. Vertinsky, Emory Law
Sam Halabi, Tulsa Law
Erika Leitzan, Missouri Law

Organizing Committee:
Cynthia Ho, Loyola Law
Emily Michiko Morris, Indiana-Indianpolis
Yaniv Heled, Georgia State
2015 Host: Kevin Outterson, Boston University School of Law

Faculty Commentators:
Michael Meurer, Boston University School of Law
Stacey Dogan, Boston University School of Law
Aaron S. Kesselheim, Harvard School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Kathy Zeiler, Georgetown Law School, visiting Boston Univiersity School of Law
Wendy Parmet, Northeastern University
Frances Miller, Boston University School of Law: Hawaii

line

Learning By Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages and Wealth

Bessen

April 6, 2015
12:45pm – 2:00pm

Room 102
Sumner M. Redstone Building

Faculty Author Book Symposium
James Bessen
Lecturer in Law
Boston University School of Law

Mr. Bessen discussed his book, recently published by Yale University Press, which examines the impact of technological advancements on economic inequality. Basing his analysis on research into economic history and today’s labor markets, he explores why the benefits of technology take years, sometimes decades, to emerge. While the right policies can hasten this process, he argues that policy in recent decades has tended to protect politically influential interests to the detriment of emerging technologies and broadly shared prosperity.

Commentators:
Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
Michael Meurer, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Matthew Marx, Associate Professor of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management, MIT Sloan School of Management

About Jim Bessen:

James Bessen studies the economics of innovation and patents. He has also been a successful innovator and CEO of a software company. Currently, Mr. Bessen is Lecturer in Law at the Boston University School of Law.

Bessen has done research on whether patents promote innovation, why innovators share new knowledge, and how technology affected worker skills historically. His research first documented the large economic damage caused by patent trolls. His work on software patents with Eric Maskin (Nobel Laureate in Economics) and Robert Hunt has influenced policymakers in the US, Europe, and Australia. With Michael J. Meurer, Bessen wrote Patent Failure (Princeton 2008), highlighting the problems caused by poorly defined property rights. A forthcoming book, Learning by Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth (Yale 2015), looks at history to understand how new technologies affect wages and skills today. Bessen’s work has been widely cited in the press as well as by the White House, the U.S. Supreme Court, judges at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the Federal Trade Commission.

In 1983, Bessen developed the first commercially successful “what-you-see-is-what-you-get” PC publishing program, founding a company that delivered PC-based publishing systems to high-end commercial publishers. Intergraph Corporation acquired the company in 1993.

line

Current Controversies in Public Health LawPublicHealth

Celebrating the Release of Public Health Law by
Professors Wendy Mariner and George Annas

Guest Speakers:

Robert F. Meenan
Special Assistant to the President, BU, and former dean of SPH

Wendy E. Parmet
Director, Program on Health Policy & Law and Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Law, Northeastern University School of Law

Dolores L. Mitchell
Executive Director, Group Insurance Commission

Monday, April 6
4:30-6 p.m.
Boston Univeristy School of Public Health
L109
line

Modern Municipal Restructurings: Puerto Rico and Beyond

puerto rico

Friday, March 27, 2015
2:00pm – 5:00pm
Reception to follow.

Room 102
Sumner M. Redstone Building
Boston University School of Law

Sponsored by Boston University Law Review, Boston University Entrepreneurship & Finance Club, Boston University Latin American Law Students Association

A symposium of leading legal and business authorities as they discuss their different perspectives on the complex and ever-evolving landscape of municipal restructurings – including a special focus on the uniqueness of Puerto Rico.

Click here for a full conference program.

Keynote Speaker:

Chief Judge Thomas B. Bennett, (United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama)

Speakers:

Seth Brumby, (Deputy Editor, Debtwire Municipals)

Sonia Colón (Partner, Ferraiuoli LLC)

Patrick Darby (Partner, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings)

Robert Donohue (Managing Director, Municipal Markets Analytics)

William Glasgall (Program and Editorial Director State/Local Accountability & Improvement, Volcker Alliance)

Bill Kannel (Member, Bankruptcy Section Head, Mintz Levin)

Marti Kopacz (Sr. Managing Director, Phoenix Management Services)

Mark Kronfeld (Partner, Plymouth Lane Capital Management, LLC.)

John Monaghan (Partner, Holland & Knight)

Zachary Smith (Partner, Moore & Van Allen; Lecturer in Law, Boston University School of Law)

Frederick Tung (Howard Zhang Faculty Research Scholar and Professor of Law, Boston University)

Schedule:

2:00pm: Welcoming / Opening Remarks Frederick Tung, Howard Zhang Faculty Research Scholar and Professor of Law, Boston University

2:10pm – 3:15pm: Legal Panel

John Monaghan (moderator)
Sonia Colón
Patrick Darby
Bill Kannel
Marti Kopacz
Zach Smith

3:30pm – 3:50pm: Keynote Speaker:
Chief Judge Thomas B. Bennett, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama

3:55pm – 5:00pm: Business Panel
Frederick Tung (moderator)
Seth Brumby
Robert Donahue
William Glasgall
Mark Kronfeld

5:15pm: Reception

line

Treasury’s War: The Unleashing of a New Era of Financial Warfare featuring Juan Zarate, Senior Adviser, Transnational Threats Project and Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program

Juan ZarateMarch 2, 2015

Over the past decade, America has quietly and successfully waged a new kind of war against the financial networks of terrorist groups, rogue regimes, proliferators, and criminal syndicates. Juan Zarate—a former senior Treasury and White House official—was part of the small group of officials who dedicated themselves to leveraging financial power and influence globally to undermine America’s enemies. The result was a dramatic redefinition of financial warfare and the role of the Treasury department—one that utilized all of Treasury’s power, influence, and relationships to dismantle illicit financial networks, stop terrorism, and influence geopolitics.

While making use of all of the tactics that government had developed over centuries, from sanctions to quiet diplomacy, Zarate and his colleagues also partnered with the private sector, creating an international financial environment in which the banks’ and multinational companies’ bottom lines dovetailed directly with national security interests, with the goal of isolating rogues from the legitimate financial system. Their approach soon became—and remains—central in navigating all the critical geopolitical challenges facing the United States, including terrorism, proliferation, and rogue regimes in North Korea, Iran, and Syria.

Treasury’s War is the story of how these tactics were developed and brought to bear on some of the most dangerous and elusive criminal and rogue enterprises around the globe. Zarate gives us an insider’s view of one of the most potent yet least-examined strategies in the war on terror and American national security, and forecasts its future impact on our security and safety. It is a vitally important chapter in our nation’s history of warfare; one that, in many ways, is still being written. Zarate warns that other nations and organizations are beginning to learn these tactics. “The financial wars are coming,” he writes. “It is time to redesign a national economic security to prepare for them.”

>> Event recap: Fighting Terrorism with Financial Artillery

This lecture was sponsored by the Office of Student Affairs and the National Security Law Society.

line

Innovation Today: The Legal Challenges of Funding
lightbulb and coinsStartups: The Review of Banking & Financial Law Symposium

February 27, 2015

This symposium, presented by the Boston University Review of Banking & Financial Law, brought together leading scholars to discuss key financial issues that startup companies face including: crowdfunding, startup financing, and the tension between state and federal law. Perspectives on current events in intellectual property, patent trolls, and the JOBS Act were presented as well. Participants examined how both startups and investors can work together to generate workable financing solutions.

Keynote recap: The Rise of Angel Capital to Fund 21st Century Entrepreneurship

Please click here to see a symposium schedule.

Please click here to read biographies of symposium speakers.

Keynote Speaker:

JEREMY HALPERN
Partner, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Speakers:

MIRIAM ALBERT
Hofstra University Maurice A. Deane School of Law

DORI BAILEY
Syracuse University College of Law

CARL BARNES
Member, Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton PC

JACK M. BEERMANN
Boston University School of Law

J. SCOTT COLESANTI
Hofstra University Maurice A. Deane School of Law

CONWAY DODGE
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement

GREGORY FRYER
Partner, Verrill Dana LLP

ADAM GHANDER
Partner, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

LUBA GREENWOOD
Boston University School of Law

JILL GROSS
Pace University School of Law

PAUL R. GUGLIUZZA
Boston University School of Law

THOMAS HALKET
Partner, Halket Weitz LLP
Adjunct Professor, Fordham Law School

JAMES JALIL
Partner, Thompson Hine LLP

H. NORMAN KNICKLE
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement

TOM C.W. LIN
Temple University Beasley School of Law

JEREMY MCCLANE
University of Connecticut School of Law

MICHAEL MEURER
Boston University School of Law

RAFAEL PORRATA-DORIA
Temple University Beasley School of Law

ERIC ROITER
Boston University School of Law

ANDREW SCHWARTZ
University of Colorado Law School

JAMES E. SCOTT
Boston University School of Law

JEFF WARD
Duke University School of Law

THEODORE WEITZ
Partner, Halket Weitz LLP
Adjunct Professor, Fordham Law School

KRISTEN YOUNG
Counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP

For additional information on the symposium, please visit http://www.bu.edu/rbfl/symposium.

line

Annual Lecture: Religious Liberty and the Culture Wars

lacockPresented by: Douglas Laycock, Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Virginia

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Religious liberty has become much more controversial in recent years. A principal reason is deep disagreements over sexual morality. On abortion, contraception, gay rights, and same-sex marriage, conservative religious leaders condemn as grave evils what many other Americans view as fundamental human rights. Somewhat hidden in the battles over permitting abortion and recognizing same-sex marriage lie religious liberty issues about exempting conscientious objectors from facilitating abortions or same-sex marriages. Banning contraception is no longer a live issue; there, religious liberty is the principal issue. These issues arise in academia as well as in the larger society.

These culture-war issues are turning many Americans toward a very narrow understanding of religious liberty, and generating arguments that threaten religious liberty more generally. Persistent Catholic opposition to the French Revolution permanently turned France to a very narrow view of religious liberty; persistent religious opposition to the Sexual Revolution may be having similar consequences here.

We can and should protect the liberty of both sides in the culture wars. Conservative churches would do well to concede the liberty of the other side, including on same-sex marriage, and concentrate on defending their own liberty as conscientious objectors; and similarly, supporters of rights to abortion, contraception, gay rights, and same-sex marriage would do well to concentrate on securing their own rights and to concede that conscientious objectors should rarely be required to support or facilitate practices they view as evil. But inducing either side to accept such live-and-let-live solutions seems to be a hopeless task.

This event was co-sponsored by the Department of Religion and the School of Law.

>> Event recap: Freedom of Religion vs. Sexual Freedom—A Conflict Between Liberties?

line

The Iron Triangle of Food Policy

The American Journal of Law & Medicine Symposium

belly

January 30, 2015

President Obama signed the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act into law on January 4, 2011. This law aimed to ensure the safety of the US food supply by preventing contamination. This symposium examined this law, and others, to consider how policy can impact access to food and food quality. Panels discussed food insecurity, obesity, GMOs and food purity, and issues with local sourcing and the access to and costs of organic food.

>> Read the event recap here

Speakers:

Kathryn Boys, Assistant Professor, North Carolina State University

Paul A. Diller, Professor of Law, Willamette University College of Law

Andrea Freeman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Hawaii School of Law

Christine Fry, Senior Policy Analyst and Program Director, ChangeLab Solutions

Jacob Gersen, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, Founder and Director of the Food Law Lab at the Petrie-Flom Center at Harvard Law School (Moderator)

Saby Ghoshray, President, Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies,
Director, Research, and Compliance WorldCompliance Company

Sam F. Halabi, Associate Professor of Law, The University of Tulsa
College of Law

Emily Broad Leib, Lecturer on Law and Deputy Director of the Harvard Law School Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (Moderator)

Stephen Miller, Associate Professor, University of Idaho College of Law

Abigail Moncrieff, Peter Paul Career Development Professor and Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law

Kevin Outterson, Professor, Boston University School of Law (Moderator)

Efthimios Parasidis, Associate Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law

Joanna K. Sax, Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development,
Associate Professor of Law, and Co-Director, Institute of Health Law
Studies, California Western School of Law

Stephanie Tai, Associate Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law School

Lindsay Wiley, Associate Professor of Law and Director, Health Law
and Justice Program, American University Washington College of Law

Diana Winters, Associate Professor of Law and Dean’s Fellow, Indiana
University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Samuel R. Wiseman, Professor, Florida State University College of Law

Kathy Zeiler, Professor of Law, Georgetown Law; Visiting Professor, Boston University School of Law (Moderator)

More information to follow. To learn more about the American Journal of Law & Medicine, please click here.