Abstract

Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented. In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their logical structure. As a result, computer programmers need not engage in physical structural design, which historically has been necessary to invent electromechanical devices. This feature of software development violates the assumptions of patent law, which generally requires that electromechanical inventions be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of their physical structure. Patent law should allow software to be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of its logical structure to produce a better fit between patent law and software.

Size: 566 KB
Est. download time @ 28.8K: 20 seconds

Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required to view this paper.
To obtain a free copy, click the button below

Robert Plotkin Contact Information

rplotkin@rplotkin.com
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Ave
Boston, MA 02215
USA


Presentation and Publication Information:

Plotkin, Robert, "Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform" . UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 7, 2003

SSRN

Click here to close this window.