|
DIMENSIONS OF NEGLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL AND TORT LAW
Kenneth W. Simons
Boston University School of Law Working Paper 02-12
Abstract
This article explores different dimensions of the concept
of negligence in the law. The first sections focus on the fundamental
distinction between conduct negligence (unreasonable creation of a risk
of harm), a conception that dominates tort law; and cognitive negligence
(unreasonable failure to be aware of a risk, either through inadvertence
or mistake), a conception that is much more important in criminal law.
The last major section identifies five significant institutional functions
served by a legal negligence standard: expressing a legal norm in the
form of a standard rather than a rule; personifying fault; empowering
the trier of fact to give content to the standard; creating a secondary
legal norm parasitic on a primary legal norm; and distinguishing grades
of fault. These functions reveal the distinctive significance of negligence,
but also disclose numerous problems that the use of such a legal standard
can pose.
Careful analysis of these different dimensions of negligence clarifies
certain misconceptions and has important implications. For example, the
question whether "negligence" is an appropriate minimum standard
of liability (e.g., for criminal punishment) is unanswerable until we
identify the type of negligence at issue (conduct or cognitive) and its
role in norm-definition (providing a general standard of liability for
harm-creation or, instead, merely an interstitial standard applying only
to some elements of a crime). Similarly, comparing negligence to supposedly
"more serious" forms of fault, such as recklessness, knowledge,
and purpose, is treacherous and sometimes amounts to comparing apples
and oranges.
A better understanding of the different conceptions of negligence and
of the distinctive institutional functions of a legal negligence standard
can facilitate the development of more coherent, and more justifiable,
fault criteria in criminal law, torts, and other legal domains.
Size: 742 KB
Est. download time @ 28.8K: 26 seconds
Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required
to view this paper.
To obtain a free copy, click the button below

Kenneth W. Simons Contact Information
ksimons@bu.edu
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Ave
Boston, MA 02215
USA
(617) 353-4701
Presentation and Publication Information:
To appear in Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Vol. 3, No. 2 (July
2002)
On Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection:
http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=323401
Click
here to close this window.
|