|
Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property
Litigation Abstract It is useful to think of intellectual property (IP) law both as a system
of property rights that promotes the production of valuable information
and as a system of government regulation that unintentionally promotes
socially harmful rent-seeking. This Article analyzes methods of controlling
rent-seeking costs associated with opportunistic and anti-competitive
IP lawsuits. My thinking is guided to some extent by the analysis of procedural
measures for controlling frivolous litigation, and analysis of antitrust
reforms designed to control strategic abuse of antitrust law. These analogies
lead me to focus on pre-trial and post-trial control measures that reduce
the credibility of weak IP lawsuits. I conclude that intellectual property
courts show some awareness of the value of fee-shifting and summary judgment
as tools for controlling opportunistic and anti-competitive lawsuits.
Courts display less awareness of the need to restrict preliminary injunctions
or encourage declaratory judgments as control measures. Antitrust suits
have only a limited role in deterring the most egregious anti-competitive
conduct.
Keywords: Intellectual Property, Litigation, Frivolous Lawsuits, Predatory Litigation, Patent, Copyright, Trademark JEL Classifications: K2, L5 Est. download time @ 28.8K: 13seconds
Boston College Law Review, forthcoming. Click here to close this window.
|