|
IN THE UNITED STATES Joan M. LeGraw Michael A. Grodin Boston University School of Law Working Paper 02-09 Abstract Since the advent of lethal injection as a method of execution there has
been an increasing escalation of executions in the United States. While
most health professions have issued position statements that officially
denounce the participation of their members, the actual involvement of
health professionals in executions has increased. We found that guidelines
regarding the limits or ethical parameters of physician participation
in executions by lethal injection have been ignored by state legislatures,
have been ineffective in influencing public opinion, and have been largely
unenforced because professional associations have neither the power to
revoke a health professional's license nor the ability to prevent its
members from violating its guidelines. In addition, there are broader
ethical implications in the use of an overdose of drugs to effectuate
the death penalty and simply refusing to participate does not address
such issues. Lethal injection execution is a violation of medical ethics
because it utilizes medical skills and knowledge to give judicial homicide
the appearance of painless clinical competence and humanity, which in
turn has insulated such executions from constitutional scrutiny and public
attack. We maintain that, because all other methods have routinely been
acknowledged to be painful and cruel, without lethal injection, the death
penalty in the United States would be unlikely to survive. Therefore,
the complicity of the health professions in this continued violation of
human rights extends beyond the actual participation of licensed practitioners. Est. download time @ 28.8K: 19seconds
Joan M. LeGraw Contact Information Director, Health Professionals Involvement in the Death Penalty
Project SSRN Site: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=317687 Click here to close this window.
|