When Should a Case be Dismissed? The Economics of Pleading and Summary Judgment Standards
Keith N. Hylton
Boston University School of Law Working Paper 06-06
Abstract
This paper applies a simple economic framework to the choice between pleading and summary judgment as points at which a claim can be dismissed. It concludes generally that pleading standards should vary with the evidentiary demands of the associated legal standards and the social costs of litigation. The common law’s imposition of higher pleading standards for fraud claims is consistent with this proposition. The theory implies that the rigorous summary judgment standards that have been developed by antitrust courts should lead to a correspondingly rigorous assessment at the pleading stage.
Size: 268 KB
Est. download time @ 28.8K: 9 seconds
Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required to view this paper.
To obtain a free copy, click the button below
Keith N. Hylton Contact Information
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
Phone: (617) 353-8959
This draft can be also found at the link below: