Torts and Choice of Law: Searching for Principles
Keith N. Hylton
Boston University School of Law Working Paper 06-41
Abstract
If a tortious act (e.g., negligently firing a rifle) occurs in state X and the harm (e.g., killing a bystander) occurs in state Y, which state’s law should apply? This is a simple example of the “choice of law” problem in torts. The problem arises between states or provinces with different laws within one nation and between different nations. In this comment, prepared for the 2006 American Association of Law Schools Annual Meeting, I examine this problem largely in terms of incentive effects, and briefly consider how the analysis could be incorporated into the standard introductory course on tort law. I conclude that a zone of foreseeable impact rule provides the best underlying principle in conflict of law situations. This rule supports the traditional legal approach (lex loci) to conflicts of laws and helps to explain modern approaches as well.
Size: 140 KB
Est. download time @ 28.8K: 5 seconds
Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required to view this paper.
To obtain a free copy, click the button below
Suggested Citation:
Keith N. Hylton, "Torts and Choice of Law: Searching for Principles, " forthcoming, Journal of Legal Education
Keith N. Hylton Contact Information
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
Phone: (617) 353-8959
This draft can be also found at the link below: