|
Should Access to Medicines And TRIPS Flexibilities Be Limited to Specific Diseases? Abstract From the perspective of public health, limiting access programs and TRIPS To date, the important global legal texts retain broad application to all relevant diseases, but the some parties continue to propose disease-specific limitations, most recently in the World Health Organization¹s Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (the "WHO IGWG"). The WHO IGWG¹s task is to distill the WHO CIPIH Report into a global strategy and plan of action. This article hopes to influence the final text of the IGWG Global Strategy, finding that disease-specific limitations on access programs and TRIPS flexibilities are inappropriate in markets for medicines, but disease-specific programs are important in markets for neglected disease innovation. Keywords: The WHO IGWG, the WHO CIPIH, World Health Organization" Commission on Innovation, Intellectual Property and Public Health; Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), TRIPS flexibilities JEL Classifications: I11, I18, K29, O34 SSRN Accepted Paper Series Size: 276KB Adobe Acrobat Reader v3.01 or greater is required to view this paper.
Suggested Citation: Kevin Outterson, "Should Access To Medicines And TRIPS flexibilities Be Limited to Specific Diseases?," forthcoming American Journal of Law & Medicine. Kevin Outterson Contact Information Boston University School of Law 765 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, MA 02215 Email address: mko@bu.edu Office Phone: (617) 353-3135
|