DZIGA
VERTOV AND WESTERN FILM STUDIES:
A
CASE OF ARTISTIC DISINFORMATION
by
Jeremy Murray-Brown
This
monograph contains some 11,500 words. Sections may be reached
quickly by clicking on sub-headings as follows:
As the Soviets struggle with yet another rewriting of their history,
questions must soon be raised about the role of those who undertook
to sell the old, now discredited, history through various forms
of artistic propaganda. In this respect, it will be interesting
to see what happens to the reputation of the early Soviet filmmakers
who are acclaimed in Western film histories as having revolutionized
the art of film much as Lenin revolutionized the art of politics.
Since these Soviet filmmakers were active propagandists for the
Stalinist system, reappraisal of their artistic claims has long
been necessary.
Of
particular interest to students of propaganda and disinformation
is the attention Western film texts give to a man known as Dziga
Vertov, a contemporary of Sergei Eisenstein, who concentrated
on the manipulation of actuality, or documentary, images. Few
people outside academic film circles will have heard of Vertov.
His films were never successful in popular terms, nor did he enjoy
the reputation in his lifetime that has subsequently been bestowed
on him in textbooks and other film literature.
The
general pattern of these writings is to present Vertov as an avant-garde
genius who was put down by Stalinist orthodoxy, a filmmaker who
shared the same vision as Lenin when Communism, so the Khrushchev/Gorbachev
thesis runs, not only had a human face but a face brightly lit
with revolutionary art. This thesis itself is due for reappraisal;
meanwhile there is clear evidence that the present-day interest
shown by some in the West in the half-forgotten figure of a Dziga
Vertov stems more from politics than aesthetics, forming part
of a program advanced by activists in what they call radical film
making. In keeping with this program, many of these activists
have inserted themselves into film study centers, where they promote
their political objectives using Vertov's name as an alibi. They
have been aided in this enterprise through associating Vertov
with the film term cinéma-vérité,
a term which still enjoys a certain réclame in some film
circles. Thus the concept of cinéma-vérité
and Vertov's role as a Soviet propagandist both merit closer examination.
THE
LIFE
Virtually
all our information about Vertov comes from Soviet sources and
is of relatively recent origin. A handful of Westerners sympathetic
to the Soviets knew him personally when they visited Moscow in
the early 1930s to study cinematic techniques, but they have added
little to our knowledge of him. The role of these few Western
individuals in helping promote Vertov's name must also form part
of our enquiry, but the main biographical facts concerning his
life seem agreed on.[1]
Dziga
Vertov was born Denis Kaufman, the eldest of three sons of Jewish
intellectuals from Bialystok, in the Polish territories of the
Czarist empire. In 1914 Vertov's parents moved to Moscow, interrupting
Vertov's studies in music in which he might otherwise have made
a career. In Moscow, during the fateful years 1914-17, he adopted
the name Dziga Vertov, perhaps, as some say, in a youthful gesture
of avant-garde adventurism (he was born in 1896), but more plausibly
in order to shed his Jewish identity.[2]
Vertov briefly contemplated a medical career at a Leningrad institute
chosen by many Russian Jews because it placed no limit on the
number of Jewish applicants. Here he met a fellow Jewish intellectual
who also changed his name and soon became well known as Mikhail
Koltsov, a Communist Party member and a high ranking Soviet journalist.
In 1918 Koltsov brought Vertov into the Bolshevik regime's fledgling
apparatus for controlling film. It seems that an encounter with
a newsreel cameraman in 1917, during Russia's brief experience
of liberal government, had led to Vertov's being captivated by
the ways visual images can be manipulated through camera and editing
procedures.
Vertov's
apprenticeship in the film business lay in helping to organize
into suitable propaganda form film material taken of Red Army
activity. He also participated in the mobile propaganda studios
which moved by train and steamer through Bolshevik controlled
territory.
In
1919 Vertov's parents emigrated to Paris with his youngest brother,
Boris. Born in 1906, Boris Kaufman became a cameraman in France,
where he worked for Jean Vigo, eventually making his way to North
America. He was the chief cinematographer for Elia Kazan's famous
picture, On The Waterfront.
Vertov's
other brother, Mikhail, one year his junior, took up still photography
in the Red Army and became a movie cameraman when the Civil War
was over. Vertov, Mikhail Kaufman, and a film editor, Elizaveta
Svilova (whom Vertov married in 1923) engaged in polemics about
the nature of cinematic reality, calling themselves a "Council
of Three". The trio worked together on several films.
With
the end of the Civil War and the switch in Bolshevik tactics to
the New Economic Policy, Vertov turned to the production of periodic
releases of "newsreels" which he called Kinopravda, the
cinematic equivalent of the Party paper. Between 1922 and 1925
it seems that some twenty-three of these propaganda pieces were
produced, most of them running for ten to fifteen minutes, although
it is not clear how they were distributed and shown publicly,
if indeed they ever were on a consistent basis. From a fragment
preserved at the Museum of Modern Art in New York it would appear
that they were sometimes shown in the street in an ad hoc manner
by Vertov and his unit themselves, the screen being suspended
from overhead trolley lines. Some may have played occasionally
in workers' clubs and neighborhood reading rooms. It's possible
that Vertov may also have had some role in the production of another
newsreel at the same time that he was working on his Kinopravda
ideas.[3]