| Perspective Volume XV Number 1 (October-November 2004) |
DEGRADATION OF THE RUSSIAN
MILITARY: GENERAL ANATOLI KVASHNIN
By Pavel Felgenhauer
Four star general Anatoli
Kvashnin, 58, was dismissed last July as Chief of Russiaıs all-powerful General
Staff after 7 years of holding the job – one of the longest tenures in Russian
military history. In our military hierarchy, the Chief of the General Staff is
number two after the Defense Minister. For many years Kvashnin was considered
the true number one.
There was no official
explanation of his ouster. Since it was announced at the same time as the
dismissal of high-ranking Interior Ministry and FSB security service generals
for failing to resist a raid by separatist rebels in Ingushetia, sources in the
Kremlin unofficially recommended that journalists should connect Kvashninıs
ouster with the rebel attack. But insiders know well that the raid, at best,
was only a pretext, and Kvashninıs story actually is indeed much more complex.
Kvashnin graduated in 1969
from a civilian university, was mustered in to serve two years as a reserve
lieutenant and then stayed to make a military career. The military
professionals always despised him as an outcast, a ³civilian² who sneaked in by
mistake. In December 1994 Kvashnin was not a widely known two star general when
he lead the Russian army into the disastrous New Yearıs Eve attack on Grozny
that disintegrated into a bloody failure with hundreds of tanks and other armor
burnt, and thousands of men massacred by the lightly armed rebels.
Kvashnin accused others for
the failure of his ³wonderful New Year attack plan² – as he described it
to me at the time. With great losses the Russian forces eventually managed to
capture Grozny in February 1995, and Kvashnin received virtually all the
credit: He was awarded the highest military decoration – Hero of Russia,
became a three star general and commander-in-chief of the North Caucasian
Military District – today our most important ³fighting² Military District
in Russia.
In April 1995, General
Kvashnin told me in Grozny: ³We will beat the Chechens to pulp, so that the
present generation will be too terrified to fight Russia again. Let Western
observers come to Grozny and see what we have done to our own city, so that
they shall know what may happen to their towns if they get rough with Russia.
But you know, Pavel, in 20-30 years a new generation of Chechens that did not
see the Russian army in action will grow up and they will again rebel, so weıll
have to smash them down all over again.²
In 1996, the Russians were
defeated by the rebels and withdrew from Chechnya. Kvashnin, as overall
military commander in the North Caucasus was directly responsible for the
debacle, but this did not affect his career. In 1997, Kvashnin was promoted by
President Boris Yelıtsin to become Chief of the General Staff. At the same time
Yelıtsin appointed General Igor Sergeyev – the commander of the Strategic
Rocket Force (SRF) since 1992 – to be Defense Minister. Kvashnin and
Sergeyev soon locked horns in a bitter conflict which ended only in 2001 with
Sergeyevıs ouster. Most of the time the two were barely on speaking terms.
Once he became Defense
Minister, Sergeyev did his best to channel all available resources into his
beloved SRF. From 1997 to 2000, up to 80 percent of Defense Ministry (MOD)
procurement money was spent on SRF-related R&D projects and to buy new
intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). In 1998-2000, Russia was procuring
20 to 30 new ICBMs a year – the most modern SS-27 (Topol-M) and also the
Soviet-designed SS-25 (Topol). Russia was building more ICBMs per year than all
other world nuclear powers put together, but not buying any new conventional
weapons.
Sergeyev also promoted a
focused military reform plan, mainly aimed at enhancing the SRF. By 1998, the
Space Forces that conduct space launches were merged with the SRF. By manning
commercial launches of satellites, the Space Forces were earning millions of
extra-budgetary dollars. The main idea of the merger with the SRF was to put
Sergeyev and his cronies in control of that money. Several years later, after
Sergeyev was ousted, the merger was called off and the Space Forces were
reinstated.
In November 1998, Sergeyev
urged Yelıtsin to sign a decree to create a Joint Main Command of the Strategic
Deterrence Forces, which would enhance the SRF by transferring command of the
entire Russian nuclear triad: Land, Naval, Air (strategic bombers) from the
General Staff. This ukaz was never enacted and the United Command was not
formed. Kvashnin mobilized anti-SRF forces in the Defense Ministry, outplayed
Sergeyev in Kremlin intrigues and prevented the formation of this Joint Main
Command that could have seriously diluted the power of the General Staff.
Kvashnin, in turn, dissolved the Ground Forces (Army) High
Command to subordinate all army units directly to the General Staff. Several
years later, the measure was recognized to have been a serious mistake and the
Army High Command was recreated.
Kvashnin began creating
³permanent readiness units,² trying to increase the battle readiness of at
least some army brigades and divisions to fight a new war in Chechnya in order
to avenge the humiliation of our military and of Kvashnin, personally, by the
separatist rebels in 1996. In 1999, the new Chechen campaign began. The General
Staff amassed over 120,000 servicemen from the MOD and other parallel armies
(Interior Ministry, Border Guards, FSB, Justice Ministry, and others).
The lightly armed rebels
(without tanks, guns, any air power, air defenses or other heavy equipment)
were outnumbered 1 to 10 and pounded with totally superior firepower. Still it
took 6 months and tens of thousands of servicemen killed and wounded to move 40
km from the border to Grozny, capture the city and occupy all of Chechnya
– a small province 160 km long and 80 km wide.
The Russian military entered
Chechnya without night/fog capable attack helicopters or fixed-wing airplanes,
and without modern communication equipment. Even the best Special Forces
solders were equipped with outdated Soviet gear that did not give them an edge
in encounters with rebels. Kvashnin was quick to lay the blame for high
casualties and sluggish performance
on Sergeyev, and his policy of siphoning scarce resources into the SRF.
In 2000, Kvashnin presented
a plan to cut the SRF drastically in size and to spend more on conventional
arms. Kvashnin also proposed that in the future the down-sized SRF should be
eliminated as a separate branch of the military and made a division of the Air
Force. Sergeyev returned fire, publicly accusing Kvashnin of ³criminal
stupidity² and ³an attempt to harm Russiaıs national interests.²
But the battle was already
lost. Sergeyev, while still the Defense Minister until 2001, was, in fact, a
lame duck. In 2000, Kvashnin was appointed a full member of the Russian
Security Council (a position no previous Chief of General Staff had occupied).
Putin also gave Kvashnin the right of official access to the Kremlin, bypassing
the Defense Minister.
Thus, in June 1999,
Kvashnin had already successfully bypassed Sergeyev and after getting a nod from
Yelıtsin, marched a column of Russian paratroopers through Serbia into the
Kosovoıs capital Pristina to overtake advancing Western peacekeepers. At the
time, this move was extremely popular in Russia: Many believed that the West
was snubbed and Russian influence in the Balkans enhanced.
Today, we know that only by
chance did advancing, heavily armed British troops fail to obey an order by
NATOıs supreme commander U.S. General Wesley Clark, to attack the small Russian
contingent and oust them from Pristinaıs airport. A British general saved
Russiaıs dignity, but our influence in the Balkans soon decreased to zero and
several years later, in acknowledgment of strategic defeat, all Russian
peacekeepers were withdrawn from the former Yugoslavia – a decision also
made by Kvashnin.
During the 1990s, the
Russian military was an unhappy and disillusioned force. Russian solders were
almost starving, surviving on a diet of bread, potatoes and cabbage. Officersı
pay was low and irregular, they had to endure bad housing and poor career
prospects in the face of defense cuts. With Sergeyev and Kvashnin pulling the
Russian military in different directions, creating havoc and internal strife,
meaningful reform was impossible.
In 2000, Putin declared
military reform a national priority. Putinıs close associate Sergei Ivanov
– a former FSB general – was given the task to make things right.
In 2000, as secretary of the Security Council, Ivanov prepared a draft plan to
cut the size of the Russian military. After the plan was approved, Ivanov was
abruptly retired from active service as a two star general, and in 2001 moved
from the Security Council to become a ³civilian² Defense Minister.
After defeating Sergeyev
and drastically increasing the power of the General Staff, Kvashnin almost
immediately began to intrigue actively against Ivanov. Of course, Ivanov had the unequivocal support of
the President. But it was widely rumored in Moscow that for Ivanov the MOD is
only a way station, he is Putinıs chosen successor in the Kremlin and will soon
move up to become, say, Prime Minister. Kvashnin, meanwhile, was maneuvering to
succeed Ivanov as Defense Minister and achieve his ultimate lifetime personal
goal – to advance to the rank of Marshal of Russia.
But Ivanovıs stay in the MOD
dragged on, and the bizarre public row with Kvashnin continued unabated,
producing administrative stalemate. Ivanovıs plans to cut drastically the
manpower of MOD and other parallel armies (there was even talk of cutting MOD
personnel to 850,000) were put to rest. In 2003, Ivanov and Putin announced
that ³military reform is over,² with all in main aims achieved. In December
2003, Putin publicly admitted that Russia had ³4 million military personnel and
those of the same legal status.² Of that number, the Defense Ministry has over
2 million. Obviously, with such
numbers it is impossible to increase the quality and readiness of personnel
significantly or provide the men with adequate pay and to give them modern weaponry.
After 2000, world oil
prices skyrocketed and Russia was saturated with billions of petrodollars.
Since 2000, the defense budget, in terms of U.S. dollars, increased threefold.
Government propaganda insists that the condition of our military has
drastically improved also. But despite some $15 billion spent since 2000 on
procurement, practically no new weapons were acquired and conditions of service
also have not improved significantly.
Social tension and
discontent are growing within the ranks. Most middle-ranking officers believe
the high brass to be a band of thieves, who will steal anything they can put
their hands on. Inside the closed military professional community it is
impossible to hide oneıs expenses and lifestyle from subordinates and
colleagues, especially if someoneıs spending is tens or hundreds of times in
excess of official pay.
Kvashnin became the focus
of discontent. Over the years retired and active service officers have told me
endless anecdotes about Kvashninıs utter stupidity and ignorance, and his
inability to perform command functions. Many also have accused him of
participation in graft. So why did Kvashnin stay so long, at so high a
position, and why was his acute unprofessionalism allowed to corrupt and
destroy our military?
Kvashnin, as many other
incompetent Russian military chiefs before him, performed an essential role of
giving the appearance of ³civilian control of the of the military.² Elements of
this system can be traced to Soviet times. Yelıtsin, who in 1991 and in 1993
had seen his power hang in the balance at the whim of generals, did not trust
his military, and when appointing top brass, he was seeking ³reliable people²
to put in command, in many cases totally disregarding their professional capabilities.
Yelıtsin also constantly maintained a system of ³checks and balances,²
deliberately creating rivalries within the MOD and enhancing the strength of
³parallel armies² to counter the MOD. Putin, who trusts only a tiny circle of
subordinates, advanced Yelıtsinıs practice of divide and rule.
It was rumored in the
Russian press that the fight between Kvashnin and Ivanov was a direct conflict
for power between the MOD and the General Staff. Of course, this is not true:
The General Staff is the true nerve center of the MOD. With or without
Kvashnin, the role of the General Staff cannot seriously be altered without the
entire structure of the MOD first being drastically changed.
Kvashnin was replaced by
his first deputy, General Yuri Baluyevsky -- a competent staff general, who for
many years, due to Kvashninıs incompetence, was running the General Staff on a
day-to-day basis. The personality clash between Ivanov and Kvashnin has been
resolved, and as so often happens when a longtime deputy takes over, nothing
much changed in the way the MOD or the General Staff function. Kvashnin, in
turn, was appointed to be Putinıs
official representative in Siberia.
Putinıs promises, as
Yelıtsinıs before him, to improve the plight of our military have failed to
materialize year after year. But despite massive discontent within the rank and
file, the possibility of any coup or other political move by the military is
close to zero. The solders are mostly conscripts or volunteers on short-term
contracts, hating or disliking their officers, who in turn hate the corrupt top
brass. Totally divided within itself, cut up into parallel armies, with leaders
it constantly despises, our military can only grumble, no matter what the
Kremlin does. That is ³civilian control² – Russian style.
Kvashnin has been moved
out, as other hated generals -- Pavel Grachev, Sergeyev -- before him. Now
maybe it is Ivanovıs turn to be the most hated one, to keep the military
disunited, dysfunctional, and under control.
_________________________________
Copyright ISCIP 2004
Unless otherwise indicated, all articles appearing in this journal have been commissioned especially
for Perspective.
| About Us | Staff | Contact | Home | ||||||