Luke and Matthew: Compilers or Authors?
by Morton S. Enslin †,
Philadelphia, Penn.
Contents
|
I. The Synoptic Problem |
2358 |
1. Gospel agreements and disagreements |
2358 |
a) Agreements |
2358 |
b) Disagreements |
2359 |
2. Mark as source of the triple tradition |
2359 |
3. The Double Tradition |
2360 |
a) Interdependence of Matthew and Luke |
2360 |
b) A second source, Q ? |
2360 |
4. Papias' words about Matthew and Mark, and conclusions drawn therefrom |
2361 |
5. Nature of Mark |
2362 |
a) Mark a Petrine gospel? |
2362 |
b) Product of a free author, not a compiler |
2362 |
6. Q, arguments for and against |
2363 |
7. Propriety of re-examination of the evidence |
2365 |
II. Critical examination of nine sections in Matthew and Luke which suggest Luke's direct use and alteration of Matthew and which indicate basic emphases of the two authors |
2366 |
1. Matt. 4.12-17; Luke 4.14-16a |
2366 |
2. Matt. 14.14; Luke 9.11 |
2367 |
3. Matt. 10.5f.; Luke 9.51-56
Matt. 28.16-20; Acts 1.7-8 |
2368 |
4. Matt. 4.1-11; Luke 4.1-13 |
2375 |
5. Matt. 8.5-13; Luke 7.1-10 |
2376 |
6. Matt. 10.2; Luke 6.14 |
2378 |
7. Matt. 8.1-4; Luke 5.12-16 and Luke 17.11-19 |
2378 |
8. Matt. 22.34-40; Luke 10.25-28 |
2384 |
9. Matt. 25.14-30; Luke 19.12-27 |
2385 |
III. Conclusion |
2387 |
| Bibliography |
2388 |
