|
-
-
June 30,
2003 © New York University. All Rights Reserved.
-
- The
tragic legacy of the Six Day War
Ahmad Faruqui
Global Beat Syndicate
(KRT)
DANVILLE, Calif—On June 5, 1967, Israel launched
a pre-emptive war against the combined militaries of Egypt, Iraq,
Jordan, and Syria. Within six days, Israeli Defense Forces had
scored a decisive military victory. The Arabs lost East Jerusalem,
containing the third holiest shrine of Islam, plus the West Bank,
the Golan Heights and the Sinai.
In November 1967, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution
242, which set forth two primary conditions for a just and lasting
peace in the Middle East. First, it called for the “withdrawal
of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent
conflict.” Second, it called for the “termination
of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment
of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence
of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within
secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of
force.”
But Israel did not withdraw. Instead, the Six Day War led to the
Yom Kippur War in 1973, and Israel later made peace with Egypt
and returned the Sinai.
It also made peace with Jordan, but did not return East Jerusalem.
To this day, Israeli occupation of this holy site continues to
fuel strong resentment against Israel in the entire Muslim world
and remains a key impediment to peace in the Middle East.
An entire generation of Palestinians has grown up in the West
Bank and Gaza under Israeli occupation. Seeing no hope for their
future, some of them have, since September 2000, resorted to carrying
out suicide bombings that have killed hundreds of Israelis. This,
in turn, has prompted Israeli retaliation that has killed thousands
of Palestinians. This spiraling cycle of violence shows no signs
of letting up, even after President Bush’s landmark visit
to the region.
In accepting the “Roadmap” put forth by the White
House, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon conceded that Israel
could not indefinitely continue to hold millions of Palestinians
under occupation. This was widely seen as a breakthrough, because
“occupation” was a word that had until then only been
used by Gush Shalom, the Israeli peace block.
Mr. Sharon also acknowledged that the time had come for Israelis
to accept the reality of Palestinian statehood. But peace will
come only if he matches his words with deeds and so far, there
has been no evidence of his sincerity.
Israel’s pre-emptive attack in Gaza against Dr. Abdel-Aziz
Rantisi, the number two man in Hamas, has unleashed a cycle of
violence that will weaken the negotiating position of Palestinian
Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas, who, in the Aqaba Agreement, had
promised to put an end to terrorism. After the Israeli attack
against Rantisi, President Bush publicly rebuked Israel, saying,
“The attacks will make it more difficult for Palestinian
leadership to fight off terrorist attacks. I also don’t
believe the attacks helped Israeli security.”
But Israel offered no apology for its action, and still seem determined
to carry out missile and other attacks against militant Palestinians
the Israelis label “ticking time bombs.”
The strategic myopia of this policy should be evident by now.
Israel knows it cannot eliminate terrorism by killing the terrorists.
For every terrorist killed, another two are created. After the
latest attack, the spiritual leader of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin,
warned of violent response, saying, “The Israelis have sent
a message. Now they have to wait for our reply. Our answer will
be of the same caliber. The Israelis don’t want peace. They
only want to humiliate the Palestinians.”
Now is the time for boldness and courage on the part of the Israeli
leaders. The Arab states pose no credible military threat to Israel.
The best defense against suicide bombers is to take away their
rallying cry, which is the illegitimacy of Israeli occupation.
Israel should declare a unilateral cease-fire with the Palestinians,
and stop carrying out reprisal or pre-emptive attacks against
the militants. Ultimately, it should withdraw from all remaining
occupied territories and eliminate the illegal Israeli settlements
on the West Bank, just as it promised to do during the Oslo Accords
of 1993. As a further step, Israel should also release the 9,000
Palestinians now being held in Israeli jails and detention centers.
So far, only 200 have been released.
Such actions will bring legitimacy to Israel in the Arab and Muslim
worlds. And only then will it acquire the peace and security that
has eluded Israel since its decisive military victory 36 years
ago.
-
ABOUT
THE WRITER
Ahmad Faruqui, an economist, writes frequently on security
issues in the Middle East and South Asia.
- © 2000
New York University. All Rights Reserved. The Global Beat Syndicate,
a service of New York University's Center for War, Peace, and
the News Media, provides editors with commentary and perspective
articles on critical global issues from contributors around the
world. For more information, check out http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/syndicate/.
-
-
Home |
About
| Archives
| Advisors
|
Staff
|
|
|