|
-
-
February
24, 2002 © New York University. All Rights Reserved.
-
Murphys Law and the Columbia Disaster
- Murphy, a NASA engineer, had it right when
he predicted that whatever can go wrong almost certainly will
-
By Lloyd J. Dumas
Global Beat Syndicate
(KRT)
DALLAS How many mistakes have you made today? How
often have you seen Murphys Law in action? Unfortunately,
Murphys Law also applies to our most dangerous technologies,
including our weapons of mass destruction.
The tragic breakup of the space shuttle Columbia as it re-entered
the atmosphere once more underlines the vulnerability of highly
complex technologies whose operation we have come to think of
as routine. Regardless of what caused the shuttle to disintegrate
human error, technical failure, or something else
the lesson is clear: when fallible human beings interact with
powerful technologies, failures are inevitable. Even when thousands
of highly trained people are intensely focused on making sure
that nothing goes seriously wrong, failure can and does still
occur.
This time, the failure took the lives of seven exquisitely trained
astronauts. The next catastrophic human-technical failure could
take the lives of many thousands of ordinary people, if it involves
a nuclear power plant, highly toxic chemicals facility, or nuclear,
biological or chemical weapon of mass destruction.
Few of us realize that the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger
in 1986 could easily have been a much greater disaster. The
next Challenger launch was scheduled to contain a Centaur rocket
carrying an unmanned spacecraft powered by 46.7 pounds of plutonium.
Had Challenger exploded on that mission, triggering an explosion
of the Centaur, well over 100,000 lethal doses of plutonium
(0.007 ounce per dose) would have been dispersed into the air.
According to John Goffman, former associate director of the
Livermore nuclear weapons labs, "If it gets dispersed over
Florida, kiss Florida good-bye." Yet last October, NASA
announced a contract with Boeing to further develop nuclear
power for space uses as part of a $2 billion "nuclear systems
initiative" advocated by the space agencys chief,
Sean OKeefe.
We have had only three fatal U.S. space craft accidents in the
42 years since the launch of Alan Shepards historic flight
on May 5, 1961: the January 27, 1967, fire that destroyed the
Apollo 1 spacecraft with three astronauts aboard during a ground
test; the Challenger launch tragedy on January 28, 1986, that
took the lives of seven astronauts; and now the loss of Columbia
and its crew. We went more than four decades more than
100 re-entries of American manned space vehicles without
a single re-entry mishap, but in the end, our fallibility still
caught up with us.
We humans are extraordinarily capable, but we are not perfect,
and we never will be. Not a single technology, from the wheel
to the space shuttle, has worked perfectly all the time.
Along with all the benefits technology has brought us, we have
developed a small but increasing number of extremely dangerous
technologies that have a potential for disaster that is incompatible
with our inherent fallibility. Some, from nuclear weapons to
nerve gas, were designed to be dangerous. Others, such as nuclear
power and highly toxic industrial chemicals, were designed for
a benign purpose, but can cause disasters if enough things go
wrong, as Chernobyl and Bhopal demonstrated with alarming clarity.
We must never permit the enthusiasm we justifiably feel for
all the marvelous things that technology can do to allow us
to forget that accidents are not bizarre aberrations. They are
everyday occurrences.
Complicating this is the fact that we live in an era when deliberate
acts of mass destruction whether due to terrorism, sabotage
or war have become altogether too commonplace. Those
ready to commit such acts have ever-greater access to increasingly
dangerous technologies mankind has created, to use as weapons
or targets of opportunity.
We are greatly alarmed that Iraq and North Korea may have, or
will soon get, weapons of mass destruction. We should be alarmed
by the proliferation of such technologies to other countries
and even to terrorist groups. But we should also be alarmed
about their continued existence anywhere even in our
own arsenals. They are an open invitation to disaster in the
hands of a species as prone to error and destructive behavior
as we are. This is not mere speculation: there were 89 publicly
reported major accidents involving nuclear weapons from 1950-1994,
an average of one every six months for 45 years.
The Columbia tragedy is the latest in a series of warnings that
we must find ways to eliminate the most dangerous technologies
from our arsenals and from our industries if we are to permanently
avoid catastrophe. As we mourn the brave Columbia crew, we must
not overlook the most important lesson they taught us: we can
enjoy the many benefits technology offers, from cell phones
to CDs, but we cannot indefinitely continue to win a game of
chicken against our very nature.
-
ABOUT THE WRITER
Lloyd J. Dumas, author of "Lethal Arrogance: Human Fallibility
and Dangerous Technologies" (Palgrave, 1999), is professor
of political economy at the University of Texas at Dallas.
- © 2000
New York University. All Rights Reserved. The Global Beat Syndicate,
a service of New York University's Center for War, Peace, and
the News Media, provides editors with commentary and perspective
articles on critical global issues from contributors around the
world. For more information, check out http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/syndicate/.
-
-
Home |
About
| Archives
| Advisors
|
Staff
|
|
|