|
-
-
September
11, 2003 © New York University. All Rights Reserved.
-
-
Baathist-Islamist
ties in Iraq: the looming threat
KRT FORUM
By Ehsan Ahrari
Global Beat Syndicate
KRT
NORFOLK, Va.—The violent events of recent weeks in Iraq,
including news that foreign Islamist fighters are increasingly
joining in attacks against U.S. troops, sabotage of Iraqi infrastructures,
and the August 19 bombing of U.N. headquarters in Baghdad, has
transformed the country into an asymmetrical battlefield between
a nexus of Islamist-Baathist forces and U.S. and British occupiers.
In the Middle East, the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq was largely
seen as an unprovoked attack against a Muslim state. That is
because the Bush administration did not simply say we went into
Iraq to liberate people from the clutch of a tyrant. Rather,
U.S. officials made grand proclamations about the U.S. mission
to transform the entire Middle East in its own image.
While the Bush administration perceived itself as doing the
Arabs and Muslims a great favor by implanting democracy—first
in Iraq and then the rest of the Middle East—it was not
hard for the Islamists of various colorations throughout the
region to label our actions as a “conspiracy” by
Western Christian society to impose its cultural predilections
over the people of Islamic faith. No Arab or Muslim government
to my knowledge has gone on the record to counter the Islamist-jihadist
propaganda.
As a result, coalition forces in Iraq are facing in Islamist-jihadist
assault of some substance. Whether the onslaught continues depends
upon two variables. First, if the saboteurs succeed by piling
up a series of major assaults on the Iraqi infrastructures that
are being rebuilt, popular anger and frustrations against the
occupying forces in general and American forces in particular
will grow. This, in turn, will be conducive to further terrorist
attacks and sabotage in other parts of Iraq. Second, if Shi’ite
opposition to the occupying forces gathers momentum, the saboteurs
will build on that that to escalate the widespread chaos into
a full-blown civil war if they can.
Although it is the largest group (65 percent) the Shias are
not united about the role of U.S. occupying forces or on the
issue of the makeup and power of a new Iraqi government. Grand
Ayatollah Ali Sistani, as the leader of the “quietist”
tradition of Shia Islam, has been largely staying out of politics,
but he is said to be feeling “great unease” about
the occupation of Iraq by foreign forces and has recently demanded
that the Iraqi constitution be written by the elected Iraqis.
The Coalition Provisional Authority has not taken that objection
into consideration up to this point.
The CPA also remains wary of the fiery rhetoric of the Ayatollah
Muqtada al Sadr, son of Iraq’s legendary Ayatollah Sadeq
al-Sadr, who was murdered in 1980 by Saddam Hussein. Muqtada
al Sadr’s organization, Jamaat al-Sadr al-Thani, is emerging
as a major force in filling the gap throughout Iraq created
by Paul Bremer’s decision to abolish the Baath party.
Even though his ambition to be a major voice of the Shias of
Iraq will not go unchallenged from other Shia clerics, the CPA
wants to be sure that no major schism develops among Iraqi Shias,
because it is bound to get worse fast amid the already chaotic
law and order situation in Iraq. Right now, if living conditions
in Iraq worsen, al Sadr’s anti-American rhetoric will
likely become even more strident.
The ascendancy of Sunni Jihadists would have a profound effect
on the Shi’ite Islamic and Islamist groups. The Shi’ite
groups may be persuaded to cooperate with the CPA, provided
it shows concrete proofs of the Western withdrawal from Iraq
in the foreseeable future. But it is not outside the realm of
possibility that instead we might face cooperation between the
Shia Islamic groups and Sunni Jihadists in efforts to use sabotage
and terror to oust the United States from Iraq.
The CPA must have a breathing room to rebuild Iraq, so that
an Iraqi government (the new buzz phrase is “Iraq face”
or “Iraqi faces”) becomes increasingly visible for
the international media and to the Iraqi people. Meantime, Baathist-Islamists
of Sunni and Shia coloration will do their best to prolong the
delay in efforts to bring calm, law and order to Iraq. Iraq
is in the midst of “darkness before dawn. We can only
hope for the break of dawn in that troubled country before a
huge and dangerous anti-U.S. coalition of former rivals makes
our presence there untenable.
ABOUT
THE WRITER
Ehsan Ahrari is a Norfolk, Virginia-based analyst who focuses
on Middle East, South Asian and national security affairs.
- © 2000
New York University. All Rights Reserved. The Global Beat Syndicate,
a service of New York University's Center for War, Peace, and
the News Media, provides editors with commentary and perspective
articles on critical global issues from contributors around the
world. For more information, check out http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/syndicate/.
-
-
Home |
About
| Archives
| Advisors
|
Staff
|
|
|