Global Reporting
Network Publications

Part 1: Introduction
 
Part 2: Pre-Planning
 
Part 3: Getting Started
 
Part 4: Structuring Stories
 
Part 5: Discussing Key Journalistic Themes
 
Part 6: In the Midst-Reporting
 
Part 7: Writing the Stories
 
Part 8: Coordinating the Series
 
Part 9: Editing the Stories Days
 
Part 10: Wrap-Up
 
Part 11: Maximizing the Impact and Follow-Up
 
Additional Resources
 

Summary: Visit with editors and brief them on the finished series. Set the groundwork for follow-up activities. Draw up an evaluation form and have the reporters fill it out.

 

Reader Feedback:
Discuss with editors the possibility of reader feedback. Suggest that each publication print a box alongside the series that encourages readers to write to the editor expressing opinions of the series. The publication might also solicit and print several opinion pieces sub-mitted by readers. The publication might even consider setting up a phone line that readers can call with comments and suggestions for future stories.

   
 
How to Conduct a Multi-Ethnic Team Reporting Project
Part 10: Wrap-Up: Day 28
By Denise Hamilton
Center for War, Peace, and the News Media
Copyright © 1997 New York University
 
Second Meeting with Editors
Evaluations

Second Meeting with Editors

Arrange an in-person visit to brief the editors or editorial board of each participating publication about the finished series. Plan to bring along a translator as needed.

This courtesy meeting also allows the coordinator to obtain feedback on the series from the publications' new perspective. And it can set the groundwork for follow-up stories and series.

During this meeting:

1. Highlight the individual contributions made by that publication's reporter and give a general overview of the work produced by the team. Leave enough time to answer any questions and to solicit comments from the editors about the completed series.

2. Finalize publication dates. Depending on a publication's size and how often it appears, an editor may split stories into two or more parts and stagger the series over a number of days or weeks. Be sure to coordi-nate publication so that all the outlet at least begin publishing the se-ries on the same day.

3. Turn in any photos, graphics, illustrations, boxes, and logos the team has compiled. Make sure that the editors plan to publish these as well as the stories.

4. Discuss the potential for follow-up stories or series at each publication. These would build on the momentum of the collaborative reporting project. Present this series as a building block in an ongoing dialogue that has now been established between the publication and the com-munities it serves.

5. Thank the editors again for their participation in the project and their will-ingness to publish the series. You may want to underscore the benefits inherent in the project. In exchange for loaning out a reporter for sev-eral weeks, the editor has received a series of high-quality articles ready for publication. Less tangibly but just as important, by partici-pating in this ground-breaking collaborative journalism effort, the participating publications have forged ties across ethnic lines, sparked public debate, and contributed to the civic health of their community.

Evaluations

Evaluations help organizers gauge the success of individual project components. Feedback from reporters can help in planning future media collaborations across ethnic lines.

Draft a project evaluation, have it translated into the appropriate lan-guage(s), and allow the reporters ample time to complete it once they finish work on the series.

To encourage frank answers, you may want to make the evaluations anonymous. Structure the questionnaire so that reporters have to pro-vide a detailed response, not merely answer yes or no. Explain that their answers are important because they will be considered in the de-sign and execution of future projects.

Here are some ideas to help draw up your evaluation:

  • What did the reporters like about the project?
  • What could have been done better?
  • What issues would they like to see addressed in future projects?
  • What did they learn about working across cultural lines, both together as journalists and while out reporting in the commu-nity?
  • What specific skills or information will be helpful and applica-ble once they return to their respective newsrooms?
  • Did they have enough time to complete their stories or was the series too ambitious?
  • What did they think of the editing? Of the salary or honorarium they received?
  • What ideas do they have for future projects and collaborations?
Click here for the Table of Contents
Click here for Part 11


Return to Global Beat Home Page

Nuclear Watch | East Asian Security | Economic & Monetary Union |

NATO Expansion | Nuclear Weapons and Proliferation |

U.S. Defense Policy | Publications | Events |

Experts Directory | Links Directory |

About the GRN |