|

| Want
to subscribe
to the Global Beat?
Send an e-mail to:wtd2@nyu.edu
with
the word "subscribe" in the subject line.
To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line.
Any
problems, comments or mail, click here:
CONTACT:
GLOBALBEAT |
For
quick access to the Global Beat, set your bookmark to:
http://globalbeat.org
|
|
U.S.
troops on patrol near the Korean DMZ
|
THE
FULL TEXT OF THE DEFENSE DEPT. MEMO REINTERPRETING THE GENEVA CONVENTION
AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS ON TORTURE:"Working Group Report on Detainee
Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism." The memo, classified
"Secret-No Foreign Dissemination" by U.S. Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld, argues that the United States signed the Geneva Convention
with reservations, and that in any case, the Convention does not apply
to Guantanamo. (U.S. Department of Defense, March 3, 2004- 49 pages pdf)
•The
U.S. Army rules of Engagement for Interrogation at Abu Ghraib--The
use of military attack dogs is authorized, but only after a written request
for permission is sent to the Commanding General. Geneva Conventions apply.
(U.S. Army, CJTF-7)
GOOD
BYE KOREA
With
U.S. troops stretched to the breaking point in Iraq, the Pentagon is reassessing
the traditional U.S. defense commitments in other places. The tentative
plan is to pull out 12,500 troops-- one third of the current U.S. strength
in South Korea. Nearly a third of that--3,600 troops--will be redeployed
to Iraq. The troops in Korea have served mostly a symbolic function. As
long as they are there an attack against the south constitutes an attack
against the U.S., which would be likely to trigger a nuclear response.
Pulling them out, however, is likely to be taken as proof that the U.S.
is so deeply entangled in Iraq that from now on more traditional alliances
risk being assigned a lower priority. (BBC, June 7, 2004)
•David
Scofield points out that tensions between Korea and the Pentagon have
been mounting for some time (David
Scofield, Asia Times, June 4, 2004)
ASHCROFT
GRILLED BY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ON TORTURE MEMOS
In response to a fierce grilling from senators, Attorney General John
Ashcroft kept repeating that as far as he knew the President had not given
any orders authorizing torture. The memos which Ashcroft referred to dealt
with advice which the Justice Department allegedly prepared for the president
reportedly altering the operating definition of torture and giving U.S.
interrogators a much broader latitude in forcing prisoners to give up
information against their will. Ashcroft refused to go into that or to
let the senators see the incriminating documents, and at one point he
was warned that he was coming dangerously close to being charged with
contempt of Congress. Margaret Warner recaps the day's proceedings, and
interviews Jess Bravin, who broke
the story in the Wall Street Journal on Monday that Defense Department
Lawyers had prepared a 100-page report last year, which also altered the
standard definition of torture to give U.S. interrogators at Guantanamo
more latitude in questioning prisoners. (Margaret Warner, PBS Newshour,
June 8, 2004)
THE
NATIONAL GUARD IS REACHING ITS LIMITS IN IRAQ
With some 40,000 troops in Iraq, the National Guard is beginning to reach
its limits, and commanders are concerned that the current pace of deployment
may not be sustainable. The Guard--with a total of 350,000 part-time soldiers
is almost as big as the professional army, but recruiting and retention
are down, and parents are beginning to tell their kids not to sign up.
(Washington Post, June 7, 2004)
DONALD
RUMSFELD ON THE WAR AGAINST TERROR
Speaking to the International Institute of Strategic Studies in Singapore,
Donald Rumsfeld stressed that the danger from terrorists is as great now
as it was when the administration launched its campaign. Rumsfeld also
responded to questions from the IISS. (Donald Rumsfeld, Pentagon, June
5, 2004)
ASSESSING
THE TERRORIST RISK IN SAUDI ARABIA
The Center for Strategic and International Studies' Anthony Cordesman
and Nawaf Obaid point out that Saudi Arabia is struggling with the fact
that with Iraq out of the way, the greatest external threat to the Kingdom
now comes from Iran, especially if Iran becomes a nuclear power. The more
immediate threat, though, is from homegrown and foreign Islamic extremists
and budding terrorist cells. (Anthony Cordesman, CSIS, May 27, 2004--41
pages in pdf)
•RAND on Future
Trends in the Middle East
•The
Economist provides a survey of recent attacks in Saudi Arabia 85 civilians,
12 Saudi policemen and 39 terrorists have been killed in the last 13 months.
Hundreds have been wounded. (Economist, June 7, 2004).
•BBC
Reporter recovering after Saudi attack against newsmen.
THE
U.S. AND BRITAIN REVISE THEIR DRAFT U. N. RESOLUTION ON IRAQ
The main
resistance to the previous draft resolution came from the French who were
concerned that the U.S. specify an exit date, and that Iraqi sovereignty
should be genuine. American and British diplomats were finally able to
get a unanimous approval for the latest versions. The BBC offers a copy
of the latest draft resolution. (BBC, June 7, 2004)
•Ray
Suarez interviews Juan Cole on PBS' Newshour on the split between Shiites
and Kurds over the wording of the resolution
•Washington
Post: The U.S. compromised
•Kurdish
leader Mustapha Barzani threatens withdrawal
(Zaman on line, June 8, 2004)
THE
LEADING CONTENDER TO REPLACE ARAFAT GETS FIVE CONSECUTIVE LIFE SENTENCES
FROM AN ISRAELI COURT
Marwan Barghouti is suspected by Israeli authorities of taking party in
some 37 terrorist attacks that killed scores of people. the court only
succeeded in proving Barghouti's direct involvement in 3 terrorist attacks
which killed five people. On those grounds the court sentenced Barghouti
to five life sentences and a supplementary sentence of 40 additional years.
Barghouti rejected the authority of the court to decide anything. (Haaretz,
June 7, 2004)
THE
ADMINISTRATION'S MIDDLE EAST PEACE INITIATIVE IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE
The International Crisis Group notes that President Bush's Broader Middle
Peace Initiative (a reincarnation of his Greater Middle East Initiative)
is running into skepticism in Europe and outright distrust throughout
the region. One reason is a general sense of lack of balance in U.S. dealings
between Israel and Palestinians.( ICG provides a background briefing,
June 7, 2004)
CRISIS
IN SUDAN'S DARFUR PROVINCE DEEPENING
Famine and
guerrilla warfare now threatens an estimated 2 million people. The U.S.
holds Khartoum responsible. Condoleeza Rice told reporters from the G-8
Summit in Georgia that President Bush discussed the situation with French
and Italian leaders during his trip to Europe. (All Africa.com, June 8,
2004)
•Rice
on Darfur
•Bush
administration denies that it overlooked Darfur crisis in order to get
peace deal between Khartoum and south (VOA, June 7, 2004)
•Darfur
Information Center
•Human Rights
Watch background on situation
G-8 MEETS AT
SEA ISLAND, GEORGIA
Summits
are usually devoted to economic issues. This one is more likely to focus
on Iraq. President Bush plans to use the opportunity to talk with leaders
individually. The U.S. government's summit website gives daily access
to briefingss and background material. (G8usa.gov, June 7, 2004)
• G8online.org offers an ongoing
background briefing on the summit. (G8online.org, June 7, 2004)
RUSSIAN
PROSECUTOR MAY HAVE BEEN KIDNAPPED BY INCREASINGLY AGGRESSIVE SECURITY
SERVICES
Rashid Ozdoyev
wrote a report critical of the involvement of the FSB, Russias Federal
Security Service in the disappearance of suspects in Chechnya's neighboring
province, Ingushetia. Then Ozdoyev disappeared himself. His father is
convinced that the FSB took him. The government response so far has been
that they have no idea of where Ozdoyev went. They add that terrorists
use the news as a weapon. (Peter Baker, the Washington Post, June 6, 2004)
|
| 
Families wait to see their relatives being held by the U.S. at Abu
Ghraib prison
|
Stretching
the Definition of Torture to Suit the Needs of the Commander-in-Chief
The
Wall Street Journal's Jess Bravin reports on a draft report prepared for
Donald Rumsfeld, which appears to lay the foundation for the abuse that
took place at Abu Ghraib and at other U.S military prisons. The 100-page
report was prepared in March 2003, when interrogators at Guantanamo complained
that they were not getting enough information from prisoners captured
in Afghanistan. According to the Wall Street Journal, the report argues
that the president has the authority as commander in chief to approve
almost any physical or psychological actions during interrogation, up
to and including torture. The rational for using torture in the report
was that nothing is more important than "obtaining intelligence vital
to the protection of untold thousands of American citizens." Although
lawyers from all the military branches and the Pentagon, several of the
lawyers objected to passages that were not in conformity with the Geneva
Conventions. These lawyers were eventually convinced to sign the final
report which was completed in April 2003. Political appointees serving
in the group reportedly wanted to give the president virtually unlimited
powers. The Wall Street Journal said that it is not known if President
Bush ever saw the report. According to the general in charge of interrogations
at Guantanamo, Donald Rumsfeld approved the harsher interrogation techniques
on April 16, 2003. Four methods required the personal approval of Donald
Rumsfeld. Those methods, were reportedly used on at least two prisoners.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the report argues that statutes
against torture do not apply to Guantanamo because the base is within
U.S. jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court is ruling this month on administration
arguments that prisoners at Guantanamo have no rights in U.S. courts because
they are not technically on U.S. territory. The report also reportedly
sketches out criminal defense scenarios for U.S. officials who may eventually
be accused of crimes of war. One recommendation was the Nuremberg Defense,
favored by Nazi war criminals--the argument is that the individual is
not guilty when he is only following orders from higher authorities.
(Jess Bravin, the Wall Street Journal, June 7, 2004)
•The
Wall Street Journal Report
•The
Washington Monthly comments on line (Kevin Drum, Political Animal,
Washington Monthly, June 7, 2004)
•Philip
Carter analyzes the report's legality on Intel Dump ( with links to previous
Bush administration memos)
•Mark
Danner in the New York Review of Books--on separating what we know from
what we have known for a long time, but have mostly refused to admit...
•Washington
Post on an August 2002 Justice Department memo arguing that international
laws against torture may be "unconstitutional" when it comes
to U.S. interrogation of prisoners.


GLOBAL
BEAT
TEAM REPORTING
PROJECTS
|

Daily News flashes
in English on developments in the Republic of Georgia (click on logo)
A
weekly on-line magazine in English and Armenian on life in Yerevan (click
on logo)
| TO
SIGN UP FOR GLOBALBEAT'S WEEKLY E-MAIL ADVISORY, SEND AN E-MAIL
TO wtd2@nyu.edu with "SUBSCRIBE" IN THE SUBJECT HEADING
(or click here to subscribe) |
|