Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 6595-6608, 2001
Abstract. On 2 June, 1994, a large subduction thrust
earthquake (MS 7.2) produced a devastating tsunami on
the island of Java. This earthquake had a number of unusual characteristics.
It was the first recorded large thrust earthquake on the Java subduction
zone. All of the aftershock mechanisms exhibit normal faulting; no mechanisms
are similar to the mainshock. Also, the large tsunami and the relatively
low energy radiated by the mainshock have lead to suggestions that this
earthquake might have involved slow, shallow rupture near the trench, similar
to the 1992 Nicaragua earthquake. We first relocate the mainshock and the
aftershocks. We then invert long period surface waves and broadband body
waves to determine the depth and spatial distribution of the mainshock
slip. A dip of 12o, hypocenter depth of 16 km and moment of
3.5x1020
Nm (Mw 7.6) give the best fit to the combined seismic
data and are consistent with the plate interface geometry. The source spectrum
obtained from both body and surface waves has a single corner frequency
(between 10 and 20 mHz) implying a stress drop of ~0.3 MPa. The main energy
release was preceded by a small sub-event lasting about 12 s. The main
slip occurred at about 20 km depth, down-dip and to the NW of the hypocenter.
This area of slip is collocated with a prominent high in the bathymetry
that has been identified as a subducting seamount (Figure
1) . We interpret the Java earthquake as slip over this subducting
seamount, which is a locked patch in an otherwise decoupled subduction
zone. We find no evidence for slow, shallow rupture (Figure
2) . No thrust aftershocks are expected if the entire locked zone
slipped during the mainshock, but extension of the subducting plate behind
the seamount would promote normal faulting as observed. It seems probable
that such a source model could also explain the size and timing of the
observed tsunami.
Journal of Geophysical Research, submitted, June 2001
Abstract. Two large earthquakes occurred on 4
and 18 June (Mw7.9), south of Sumatera in the Indian Ocean. Both
earthquakes were predominantly left-lateral strike-slip on vertical,
north-south trending faults that we interpret to be reactivated fossil
fracture zones (Figure 3). The 18
June earthquake in the Wharton Basin is one of the largest shallow
strike-slip faulting earthquakes recorded. A small, second subevent
with reverse slip is required to fit the bodywaves. The orientation of
both subevents in our preferred model is consistent with the current
stress field in the region. The purely strike-slip source model of the
Wharton Basin earthquake obtained by Robinson et al. [2001] is
unable to fit the P waves, and does not fit the S waves any better
than our preferred model. The occurrence of the 4 June, Enggano,
earthquake implies that the stress field within the Indian plate
continues to a depth of 50 km in the subducting slab. The hypocenter
of the Enggano earthquake was at the southeastern end of the rupture
area of the 1833 subduction earthquake. The strike-slip subevent of
the Enggano earthquake triggered a thrust subevent on the plate
interface, which comprised 35% of the total moment and ruptured away
from the region of the 1833 earthquake. Both the June 2000 earthquakes
are consistent with recent models of distributed deformation in the
India-Australia composite plate. The strike-slip subevents of both
earthquakes had few aftershocks and higher stress drops than the
subduction thrust subevent of the Enggano earthquake, consistent with
previous observations of oceanic and subduction earthquakes.
Last modified: August 2001