EE 511: Ecological Economics
Course Information
|
Instructor: |
Brynhildur
Davidsdottir Office:
STO 466; Office Hours: by appointment. Tel. 617-349-2744. email:
bdavids@bu.edu or brynhildur_davidsdottir@abtassociates.com |
|
Meeting
Time: |
Lecture:
Tuesday
6-9 PM |
|
Classroom Locations: |
Lecture: CAS 453 |
|
Readings |
Reading
packet: available at STO 141 Ð occasional additional readings will be
available as well in the CEES office. |
|
Course
Description and
Course
Objectives |
The increase in human numbers and economic
activity has put Homo Sapiens in a position to greatly influence the flow
of energy and matter on Earth. Explaining the extent and impacts of this
influence is well beyond the theory and analytical tools of individual
disciplines, such as economics, ecology or the physical sciences. A new interdisciplinary approach is
needed, one that unites the relevant aspects of different disciplines. The
theory and tools necessary to understand the relation among human
populations, natural resources, the environment, and economic growth are
brought together in the discipline of Ecological Economics. In this course you will be introduced to the
history and methods of Ecological Economics. Methods such as green national accounting, valuation
of ecosystem services, measuring resource scarcity, accounting for natural
capital and the methods of industrial ecology, are discussed in detail. After taking this class you will be able to
think critically about economic theory, apply the concepts taught in the
class as well as, hopefully feel inspired to contribute to the development of
this new exciting field of research. |
|
Grading: |
Your
grade is based on four short in-class quizzes and a take-home cumulative
final, in addition to a research paper and a review paper. The final exam
will be given out on Tuesday May 3rd. Research
Paper:
30% - due on Tuesday April 26th. The research paper should be
maximum 15 pages of double-spaced text, excluding graphs and references. The
topic must be approved by the instructor, and a one-page proposal is due on
Tuesday February 15th. Be prepared to discuss your potential topic
in a group-brainstorming session on Tuesday February 8th. Book
Review or Literature Review (on a topic unrelated to your research
paper). 10% due date TBA Four
(4) very short quizzes: 5% each, time TBA. Final exam (take-home): 20% (essays), given on May 3rd. Class
participation, occasional short assignments: 20%. This class is heavily discussion
based and therefore requires that you read the assigned material before coming to class and
participate in discussion. Many of the ideas we will discuss are
controversial, and we will spend a considerable amount of time debating and
discussing the class material. Each student will be assigned a week where
he/she must be prepared to lead discussions hint: and thus be extra well
prepared that particular week! |
|
Incomplete
Grades: |
ÒIÓ grades are given only when specific work has not been completed AND when the student and instructor have conferred and the instructor has assigned a date within the next 12 months for the work to be completed. The I grade automatically becomes a permanent F if the work is not completed with 12 months from when the incomplete was given. This is CAS policy. |
|
Academic
Honesty and Copyright |
Plagiarism
and other forms of academic misconduct are serious offenses. I take them very seriously and I
expect my students to do likewise. You should read the CAS Academic Conduct
Code
for further information about specific definitions, procedures, sanctions,
etc. Copies of the Code are available in CAS
105. I am required to refer cases of
suspected academic misconduct to the CAS DeanÕs Office. The
syllabus, course descriptions, and handouts created by Professor
Davidsdottir, and all class lectures, are copyrighted by Boston University
and/or Professor Davidsdottir.
Except with respect to enrolled students as set forth below, the
materials and lectures may not be reproduced in any form or otherwise copied,
displayed or distributed, nor should works derived from them be reproduced,
copied, displayed or distributed without the written permission of Professor
Davidsdottir. Infringement of the copyright in these materials, including any
sale or commercial use of notes, summaries, outlines or other reproductions
of lectures, constitutes a violation of the copyright laws and is
prohibited. Students enrolled in
the course are allowed to share with other enrolled students course
materials, notes, and other writings based on the course materials and
lectures, but may not do so on a commercial basis or otherwise for payment of
any kind. Please note in
particular that selling or buying class notes, lecture notes or summaries, or
similar materials both violates copyright and interferes with the academic
mission of the College, and is therefore prohibited in this class and will be
considered a violation of the student code of responsibility that is subject
to academic sanctions. |
|
DATE |
TOPIC |
READING |
||
|
T |
Jan. |
18 |
Introduction to the course |
Daily 2004
|
|
|
|
|
PART 1.The Beginning Ð Basic Organizing Laws and Principles |
|
|
T |
Jan. |
25 |
Motivation and Historical Roots of Ecological Economics Where and when did it all begin? |
Cleveland 1987, Boulding 1966, Daly 1968, Martinez-Alier 1987,
Costanza 1998 |
|
T |
Feb |
1 |
Concepts and tools of economics Concepts and tools of thermodynamics |
Christensen 1989, Daily 1992, Ruth 1993,
Victor 1991
Georgescu-Rogen 1971, Ayres
1978, Ruth 1994 |
|
T |
Feb |
8 |
Concepts and tools of ecology The
link between ecosystems, thermodynamics and the economy Ð co-evolution and
evolutionary economics How do thermodynamics and ecology inform economic
decision-making? The making of a sustainability science. |
Folke 1999, Ruth 1993
Norgaard 1985, Norgaard 1988 Ruth 1996, Allen 1994, Daily 2004.
Daily 1992
|
|
|
|
|
PART 2. Valuing ecosystem services |
|
|
T |
Feb |
15 |
Comparative Value Theories Classical, neoclassical, Marxism, biophysical, ecological
economics Valuing ecosystem services Ð comparative analysis of
different values (e.g. use and non-use values) and different methods. The methods discussed are: Contingent
evaluation, travel cost, hedonic pricing, energy theory of value, avoided cost, replacement values. Comparative case study Discussion Ð Can the price ever be right?
|
Hall et al. 1986
Farber
et al. 2002 Goulder and Kennedy 2000
Groot et al 2002 Kristrom 1999, Johansson, 1999 Costanza et al 1989. |
|
T |
Feb |
22 |
No Class - Monday Schedule of Classes |
|
|
|
|
|
PART 3. How well are we doing? What are the appropriate
sustainability indicators? |
|
|
T |
March |
1 |
Greening the National Accounts Standard National Accounts Accounting
for Natural Capital Incorporating natural and human capital into national accounts Ð weak and strong sustainability, welfare indicators |
Cherry 1980
Daily
and Cobb 1990 Costanza and Daily 1992 Costanza et al 1997 Van Dieren1995, p. 167-257 |
|
T |
March |
8 |
Spring
Recess |
|
|
T |
March |
15 |
Incorporation of Natural and Human Capital into National
Accounts Weak Sustainability Ð specific methods Ð case studies Incorporation of Natural and Human Capital into National
Accounts Strong Sustainability Ð specific methods Ð case studies Welfare Indicators, HDI Ð case studies |
Neumayer
2003 Neumayer
2003, Hueting 1991 and WWF 1992. Cobb and Halstead 1994
Costanza et al 1997 Van Dieren1995 |
|
T |
March |
22 |
Natural Resource Scarcity
Malthus,
Ricardo, Barnet and Morse, Slade - Neoclassical approach Biophysical
approach. Best first, resource quality, economic and environmental energy
cost EROI
case studies |
Krautkraemer
2002
Hall
and Hall 1984 Norgaard
1990
Cleveland 1991 |
|
T |
March |
29 |
Limits to Growth? Micro-foundation.Production Functions Ð incorporating
thermodynamic limits
Substitution and
technological change Material and energy efficiency, energy quality Technological change and thermodynamic limits - role of energy in technological change, learning curves |
Nicholson, chapter 10 Stern
1996
Ayres and Nair 1984 Patterson 1996. Cleveland et al. 2000 Ruth and Bullard 1993 deVries and Berry 1979 Technical change Ð ch.6
Loschel 2002 |
|
T |
April |
5 |
Are there limits to growth? Comparative analysis of different
paradigms |
Meadows
et al 1972
Mikesell
1995
Solow, R. 1992 Ecological Economics
sept.1997, pages 261-275 Victor 1991 |
|
|
|
|
Bringing Concepts to Action |
|
|
T |
April |
12 |
Environmental
policy design Ð insight from ecological economics Natural
Resource Management Ð insight from ecological economics Ð aquaculture and
forestry |
Underwood
and King 1989 Costanza et al. 1997. 192 Ð 217 Folke (1988) Creedy
and Wurzbacher 2001 |
|
T |
April |
19 |
Industrial ecologyIndustrial ecology flow cycle
The
triple bottom line Dematerialization |
Graedel
and Allenby 1995
Cleveland
and Ruth 1999 |
|
T |
April |
26 |
Tools of Industrial Ecology
LCA
Ð life cycle analysis Net
Energy Analysis Environmental
Cost Accounting Case
study |
Graedel and Allenby 1995
Bourman
et al. 2000 |
|
T |
May |
3 |
Student Presentations The Future of the Discipline |
|
Reading list
Ayres
R.U, 1978, Applications of Physical Principles to Economics, in Resources,
Environment and Economica.
Ayres,
R.U. and I. Nair. 1984. Thermodynamics and Economics. Physics Today. pp. 62-71.
Bergh (ed.) Handbook
of Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 809
Ð 823.
Boulding
K.E., 1966, The economics of the coming spaceship earth, Excerpt from ÒQuality
in a growing economyÓ.
Bourman et al.,
2000,Material flows and Economics models an analytical comparison of SFA, LCA
and partial equilibrium models, Ecological Economics 32:195-216.
Cherry,
R.D., 1980. Chapter 4 - Production, Income, and Spending, in Marcoeconomics, Addison-Wesley Pub.
Co., Reading, MA. pp 61-91.
Christensen, P.P.,
1989. Historical Roots for
Ecological Economics: Biophysical
versus Allocative Approaches Ecological Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 17 - 36.
Cleveland
C., 1987, Biophysical Economics: historical perspective and current research
trends, Ecological Modeling 38:47-73.
Cleveland
C., 1991, Natural Resource Scarcity and Economic Growth Revisited: Economic and
Biophysical Perspectives, in:
Costanza R. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability.
Costanza,
et al., 1997, An Introduction to Ecological Economics, pages 192 Ð 217.
Costanza, R. and B.C.
Patten. 1995. Defining and Predicting Sustainability,
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 15, pp. 193 Ð
196.
Costanza, Robert and
Herman E. Daly. 1992. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation
Biology,
Vol. 6(1). pp 37-46.
Costanza, Robert,
Stephen C. Farber, and Judith Maxwell. 1989. Valuation and Management of
Wetland Ecosystems. Ecological Economics, Vol. 1. pp 335-361.
Costanza, Robert,
1998. Beyond the Argument Culture,
Ecological Economics, Vol. 27, pp.
113 Ð 114.
Creedy, J., and Wurzbacher, A.D. 2001, The economic value of forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits, Ecological Economics 38:71-83.
Daily
H.E., and Cobb J.B., 1990, Misplaced Correctness: Measuring Economic Success,
in: For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community.
Daly,
H., 1968, On economics as a life science.
Daly, H.E. 1992. Steady-State Economics: Concepts, Questions, Policies, GAIA, Vol. 1, pp. 333 - 338.
Daily et al. 2004,
Ecological Economics, Island Press.
de Vries, Bert and R.
Stephen Berry. 1979. Physical Information in Economic Analysis in R.A. Fazzolare and C.B.
Smith (eds.) Changing Energy Use Futures, Pergamon Press, Frankfurt, pp. 156 Ð
164
aEcological Economics,
1997, pages 261 Ð 274.
Folke, C.
1999. Ecological Principles
and Environmental Economic Analysis, in J.C.J.M. van den Bergh (ed.) Handbook
of Environmental and Resource Economics,
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 895 Ð 911.
Folke, Carl and Nils
Kautsky. 1989. The Role of Ecosystems for a Sustainable Development of
Aquaculture. Ambio,
Vol. 18(4). pp 234-243.
Folke, Carl. 1988.
Energy Economy of Salmon Aquaculture in the Baltic Sea. Environmental
Management,
Vol. 12(4). pp 525-537.
Georgescu-Rogen
N., 1971, The entropy law and the economic problem.
Goulder and Kennedy, 2000, Valuing Ecosystem Services,
Philosophical Bases and Empirical Methods, in NatureÕs Services.
Graedel and Allenby, 1995, Industrial Ecology,
Prentice Hall.
Groot et al., 2002, A typology for the classification,
description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services,
Ecological Economics, 41:393-408.
Hall, C.A.S., C.J.
Cleveland and R. Kaufmann. 1986. Chapter 3-Value in Classical Economics in Energy and Resource
Quality,
Wiley-Interscience, New York. Pp. 69-76.
Hall,
D.C. and J.V. Hall. 1984. Concepts and Measures of Natural
Resource Scarcity with a Summary of Recent Trends, Journal of Environmental
Economics and Management, Vol. 11, pp. 363 Ð 379.
Hueting, R. 1991.
Correcting National Income For Environmental Losses: A Practical Solution For a
Theoretical Dilemma in R. Costanza (ed.) Ecological Economics, Columbia University
Press. Pp 194-213.
Johansson, P-O. 1999. Theory of Economic Valuation of Environmental Goods and
Services, in J.C.J.M. van den Bergh (ed.) Handbook of Environmental and
Resource Economics,
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 747 Ð 754.
Juan
Martinez-Alier, 1987, Introduction, in Ecological Economics: Energy,
Environment and Society, Chapter 1.
Krautkraemer,
2002, The Economics of Scarcity: State of the debate. Manuscript
Kristršm, B. Contingent Valuation, in J.C.J.M. van
den Bergh (ed.) Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar
Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 777 Ð 795.
Loschel, 2002,Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey, Ecological Economics 43:105-26.
Meadows,
D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Belnews. 1972. Chapter 11-The Limits
to Exponential Growth, in The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New
York.
Mikesell, R.F. 1995. The Limits to Growth:
A Reappraisal, Resources Policy, Vol. 21, pp. 127 - 131.
Neumayer, E, 2003, Weak
versus Strong Sustainability Ð chapters 5 and 6.
Norgaard, Richard B.
1985. Environmental Economics: An Evolutionary Critique and a Plea for
Pluralism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 12. pp. 382-394.
Norgaard, Richard B.
1990. Economic Indicators of Resource Scarcity: A Critical Essay. Journal of
Environmental and Economics and Management, Vol. 19. pp 19-25.
Patterson
M.G., 1996, What is Energy Efficiency? Energy Policy, 24:377-390.
Ruth,
M., 1996, Evolutionary Economics at the Crossroads of Biology and Physics,
Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 19(2):125-144.
Solow,
R., 1992, An almost practical step towards sustainability, Resources for the
Future.
Stern
D., 1996, Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and
consumption: a neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics.
Technical
Change and Thermodynamic Limits Ð chapter 6.
Underwood,
D.A. and P.G. King. 1989. On the Ecological Foundations of
Environmental Policy, Ecological Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 315 - 334.
Victor,
Peter A. 1991. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Some Lessons from Capital
Theory. Ecological Economics, 4. pp 191-213.