![]() |
"Psychophysical evidence for a relative object motion mechanism in humans" |
![]() |
Scott A. Beardsley & Lucia M. Vaina
Brain & Vision Research Laboratory
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Boston University
Boston MA 02215
USA
Purpose. To quantify the perceptual properties of a
relative motion mechanism in which object trajectory discrimination is
differentially affected by the presence of a moving background. First,
in a series of experimental conditions we identify a global relative
motion mechanism whose properties can be perceptually differentiated
from more local direction mechanisms. Second, to gain additional
insight into the nature of the underlying computational mechanisms,
we examine several motion specific properties in greater detail
(i.e. velocity tuning, and spatial summation). Methods. Motion
stimuli were represented as constant density random dot kinematograms
presented within a 24 degree aperture for 440±40 ms. In the basic
trajectory discrimination task, stimuli consisted of a motion-defined
object moving in the same or opposite direction as a
translating background. Using a central fixation 2TAFC paradigm, subjects
discriminated the direction of object motion perturbed perpendicular to
an imaginary horizontal or vertical line centered on the screen. Spatial
summation and velocity tuning were examined by modifying the visual
extent, degree of motion noise, and relative velocities between the
object and background motions. Results. Trajectory discrimination
thresholds for object motions that opposed the background
were significantly lower (p<0.05) than for objects moving in the
same direction as the background. As the relative trajectory
differences between the object and background increased through 90 deg.,
discrimination thresholds consistently decreased across subjects. A
coarse sampling of discriminability across a range of dot and object
speeds (9-22 deg/s) showed no significant variation in threshold
performance. Conclusion. The difference in discrimination
thresholds between same and opposite object trajectories
coupled with the observed speed invariance and a lack of non-motion based
visual cues suggests the presence of a global relative motion mechanism
within the visual motion pathway that differentially segregates object
trajectories from the background. Such mechanisms could play a role in
motion-based object localization and visual scene segregation.