BU Alumni Web

Bostonia: The Alumni Magazine of Boston University

Summer 2010 Table of Contents

All Religions Are Not Alike

Stephen Prothero calls “pretend pluralism” a danger

| From Commonwealth | By Rich Barlow

Stephen Prothero says that understanding religions’ differences is the start of accepting them. Photograph by Vernon Doucette

How does a religion teacher get an invitation to appear on Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report? By writing a book saying that Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, and others have preached about the shared, benign beliefs unifying all great religions — and then dismissing that message as garbage.

Stephen Prothero’s God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World — and Why Their Differences Matter (HarperOne), which hit bookstores in April, argues that the globe’s eight major religions hold different and irreconcilable assumptions. They may all push the Golden Rule, as progressives like to point out, but no religion really considers ethics its sole goal. Doctrine, ritual, and myth are crucial, too, and on these, writes the College of Arts & Sciences professor, there is no meeting of the religious minds. For example, Christians who think they’re doing non-Christians a favor by saying they too can be “saved” ignore the fact that Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and Confucians either don’t believe in sin or don’t focus on salvation from it. (Hinduism, Daoism, and the African religion Yoruba round out the eight.)

The notion of “pretend pluralism,” as Prothero derides it, may be nobly intentioned, but it is “dangerous, disrespectful, and untrue.” It blinds us to understanding, and therefore solving, Islamic fundamentalist terrorism or Jewish-Arab disputes over Jerusalem or the contest for Kashmir between two nuclear powers with competing religious majorities (Hindu India and Muslim Pakistan), he writes.

“People are thirsty for information about this topic,” says Prothero, who appeared on The Colbert Report on June 14. “We are in a post-9/11 moment. It became clear we did not understand what was going on in the world — ‘Oh my God, there are Muslims who want to kill us.’”

How do Prothero’s academic colleagues feel about his latest thesis? One could say that their responses are definitely not one. Nonagenarian author Huston Smith, whose book The World’s Religions is a classic in the field, says Prothero misrepresents him as an apostle of pretend pluralism.

“The historical religions are both alike and different,” Smith says. “They are alike in believing in God’s existence and that His/Her/Its will is that we love one another.” (Prothero’s book begs to differ: many Buddhists don’t believe in God, while Hindus believe in multiple gods.) “However, they are a far cry from being carbon copies of one another.”

Another noted liberal theologian, Harvard’s Harvey Cox, gives Prothero qualified support. “Steve is right that the‘unity’ of religions has been exaggerated,” says Cox. “He helps us all see that in interfaith dialogue, we converse with a genuine ‘other.’ What he may overlook is that religions are changing, sometimes quite rapidly — the lines between them are becoming more porous — and that a considerable amount of borrowing back and forth has been going on.”

This isn’t the first time that Prothero has held a mirror to our religious views. In 2003’s American Jesus: How the Son of God Became a National Icon, he probed the personal projections we foist on the Christian Son of God, from SUV owner to eco-conscious greeny. His 2007 book, Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know — and Doesn’t, achieved best-sellerdom and a spot for its author on The Daily Show by scolding Americans as religious doofuses. We think Sodom and Gomorrah are a married couple, he wrote, and he urged mandatory public-school education about religions.

Download: Download this Article

Print: Print this Article

Share:

Email: Email this Article

The content of this field is not retained.

Enter multiple email addresses separated with commas.


Comments

On 6 July 2011 at 2:54 PM, Greg Hersh (MET'89) wrote:

“The historical religions are both alike and different,” Smith says. “They are alike in believing in God’s existence and that His/Her/Its will is that we love one another.” Well, that's clearly wrong, of course. Judaism, for instance, puts the emphasis on following the law of G'd. The idea of "love each other" starts with Christianity. Don't know what H.Smith's academic credentials are. Master in Political (eh, religious) Correctness?

On 24 March 2011 at 6:03 PM, James Sundquist (CAS'14) wrote:

The article represents Hinduism as a polytheistic faith, but doesn't Hindu belief include a supreme, universal spirit called Brahman? Although there are several gods, including Vishnu, Shiva, and Brahma, they are all part of a single universal spirit. I think the article's depiction of Hinduism is misleading.

On 24 December 2010 at 5:28 PM, Nur (ENG'02) wrote:

Dear Stephen Prothero, with respect of your believe and knowledge, I think this "Doctrine, ritual, and myth are crucial, too" shows how far you are not considering basic teachings of Islam. and if you base things in singht of your scope means that are you short sighted. On the other-hand, " “We are in a post-9/11 moment. It became clear we did not understand what was going on in the world — ‘Oh my God, there are Muslims who want to kill us.’” this is a blindness condemning of 1.6billion Muslims on the planet. why don't you discuss, why USA striks Muslim inhibitant areas of the world? Afgan, Iraq, Gazza, Pakistan and Somalia? when a person sees such horiable massacre or butchery, call what you like, causes him/her to revenge. "What he may overlook is that religions are changing" as far as I believe Islam,and have read some about Holly bible, transformation comes from understanding of the people and increase of their knowledge or overlook of some matters. but not the Religion is changed. To make one example, believe never changes but believer's situation transforms from and to. Thank you

On 24 December 2010 at 4:01 PM, Udyam Kumar wrote:

People are very lenient towards one extreme: either religions are the same, or they are completely different. There needs to be a balanced explanation, supposedly pointing out specific components of what is similar and different about each religion. I especially like the point of how religions are becoming more porous through rapid change.

Post Your Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Which is lightest? elephant, cat, moon, tissue

Persons who post comments are solely responsible for the content of their messages. Bostonia reserves the right to delete or edit messages.