Language in Autism and Specific Language Impairment (SLI)
Face Processing in Autism
Social Perception in Williams Syndrome
Social Emotional Development in Children
Neuroimaging of Language and Social Communication in Autism
Face Processing in Autism
This project is part of an autism program project that began in 1997. It is funded by NIDCD, and is part of the Collaborative Programs of Excellence in Autism. This project’s current funding period extends through 2007.

Project Aims

This research project investigates the social-communicative abilities of children with autism as revealed through their capacity to process information from people’s faces. In recent research, we found that children with autism engage in atypical face recognition strategies that involve an unusual reliance on the mouth and deficient processing of the eyes. This work is now being extended by probing the entire range of face perception abilities in autism, including perception of face identity, facial expressions of emotion, eye gaze direction, and facial speech. We are using behavioral, eye-tracking and physiological measures in these experimental studies of adolescents with autism.

The questions addressed by these studies include:
  • Do children with autism show improved eye recognition when they are cued to inspect the eye region of the face during learning trials?

  • Do they evidence holistic perception of face identity when feature-based strategies are not available?

  • Do they show a similar pattern of deficiency in the holistic perception of facial emotions, with intact recognition of emotions expressed via the mouth, but impaired recognition of those expressed primarily through the eyes?

  • Are they less proficient at reading visual speech from the eyes than from the mouth?

  • Are they impaired in following eye gaze and in judging eye gaze direction?

  • Are deficits in holistic perception of faces and perception of information from the eye region related or independent?

  • What is the pattern of deficits in perception of identity, emotion, gaze, and visual speech in eyes across participants? Are these deficits related, and is any one deficit more prominent than others?