The Environmental History of Africa
Topic 9 - Images of Degradation: Creeping Desert?

- Science in the colonial period and up to the 1970s began from assumptions
about the nature of past landscapes and the role of African's in shaping it:
Degradation narratives are ideas about environmental decline (such as desertification,
erosion, loss of biodiversity) that appeal to popular images and also direct
decisions that affect policy and development aid.
- Degradation narratives are inherently historical in their arguments. Anthropologist
Allan Hoben has defined as degradation narrative as: ...historically grounded,
culturally constructed paradigms that at once describe a problem and prescribe
its solution. Many of the environmental narratives about Africa are rooted
in a narrative that tells us how things were in an earlier time when people
lived in harmony with nature, how human agency has altered that harmony, and
of the calamities that will plague people and nature if dramatic action is
not taken soon.
- Science has played a role in setting assumptions about environmental degradation
in Africa.
- In 1972-74 successive years of drought triggered a famine that swept
across the African Sahel from Senegal to northern Ethiopia. Beyond its
tragic human effects, the drought/famine also produced Africa's first
media tragedy: images of cruel nature and human suffering appeared on
television and in major print media.
- The most enduring image may be Time magazine's poignant full-page photograph
of a desiccated and stiff carcass of a cow lying forlornly in a dry waterhole.
Several years later a BBC reporter informed me that an ambitious news
photographer had taken it upon himself to construct that riveting scene
by dragging a dead bovine into the waterless depression because the surrounding
landscape had already turned green from renewed rains.
- In 1987 the highly regarded PBS science program NOVA broadcast a documentary
film entitled "The Desert Doesn't Bloom Here Anymore." The film played
on the public memory of the 1972-74 famine by presenting striking images
of despoiled arid landscapes from West Africa and from the western United
States. In both cases, the film argued, the cumulative weight of human
action had transformed a delicately balanced natural order into environmental
disaster.
- Footage of the Burkinabe village showed bleak brown landscapes and conditions
of stark poverty, images particularly effective with a viewing audience
from green temperate latitudes. Computer-generated animation of a Sahelian
landscape showed the disappearance of trees and the southern creep of
the desert. The thesis was that historical weight of human abuse under
rapid population growth and the search for profit had created degraded
land and made permanent changes in both landscapes and climate.
- "The Desert Doesn't Bloom Here Anymore" had an ideological message --bad
land management by humans creates deserts-- hidden in its reportage.
- The argument was not just dogma, it had a basis in science of the mid-1970s.
- In 1974 Joseph Otterman, an Israeli climate scientist who had worked
in Israel's Negev desert, published his research hypothesis that posited
a relationship between drought and the loss of vegetative cover. Specifically,
he argued that bare, highly reflective soils in semi-arid zones would
increase surface "Albedo" (reflectivity), and reduce convective processes,
thus resulting in decreased rainfall. Otterman attributed vegetative change
to overgrazing, though one could easily extend his thesis include to other
economic activity that exposed the soil, such as tree-cutting and annual
cropping. Thus, in this view day-to-day human activity, especially tasks
performed by women, was responsible for creating drought.
- This scientific hypothesis seemingly confirmed a popular suspicion in
the West than African farmers and herders had brought on their own crisis.
- A year later, Jule Charney, an M.I.T. climatologist proposed a similar
cause for desertification that pointed a finger directly at local land
use as the agent of climatic change. Charney argued that changes in vegetative
cover could indeed increase aridity. He held that desertification was
not the result of a single causal factor but an ever tightening chain
of events that began with the removal of plant cover followed by a loss
of the soils' moisture retention and resulting in a reduction of rainfall
that, in turn, further reduced vegetation. With this science as a backdrop,
the Nova film's pessimistic images of West African farmers closed the
Neo-Malthusian circle: under severe population growth African farmers
had occupied fragile lands and their poor land management had pushed the
Sahel into a slide toward desert.
- Desertification as a concept of human-induced environmental change:
- The science of the 1970s added to an existing set of conclusions about
the presence and origins of desertification in Africa from an earlier
historical epoch. Anthropologist Jeremy Swift's study of colonial land
studies of the late 1930s argued that the Sahara desert was advancing
at an alarming and measurable rate.
- The most widely distributed and influential of these reports, by the
colonial forester E.P. Stebbing, held that the root cause was human misuse
of resources.
- French forester A. Aubrèville coined the term desertification to describe
the human-induced process of land degradation in the West African Sahel.
- Placing blame on African farmers and pastoralists external agents justified
colonial rule, central planning, and the urban control of rural resources.
In the post-independence era desertification, however vaguely defined
and applied, as a justification of coercion and paternalism by urban elites,
was already rather firmly in place by the time the African Sahel experienced
the severe droughts of the mid- 1970s
- Institutional Applications of Concept of Desertification:
- Based on early colonial assertions, embryonic scientific hypotheses,
and popular assumptions of the 1970s, the idea of human agency in African
climate change diffused into international policy and media representations
of the late 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.
- In 1977 the influential environmentalist group Worldwatch Institute
and its director Lester Brown officially linked the Sahara's advance with
African land use practices, such as overgrazing, increased cultivation,
and firewood gathering. In that same year the United Nations Conference
on Desertification asserted specific figures for desertification: 10 percent
of the earth's surface was "man-made" desert and another 19 percent was
under threat by human mismanagement.
- By the mid-1980s linking African farmers and pastoralists with advancing
desert was commonplace in the popular press, including in such reputable
organs as National Geographic that projected the definitive aura of science
and richly illustrated the degradation narrative.
- The Ethiopian famine of 1984-85 presented more immediate and more graphic
images of Africans suffering amidst degraded landscapes. In 1991 the United
Nations further added its bureaucratic imprimatur by officially defining
desertification in anthropogenic terms as "land degradation in arid, semi-arid
and dry sub-humid areas resulting mainly from adverse human impact."
- International policy thereby placed Africa's environmental crises of
the 1970s at the doorstep of Africans themselves, the result of both alarming
rates of population growth and land degradation. This view was both historically
based (even if wrongheaded) and judgmental: Africans were reaping the
whirlwind of their past actions.
- New Evidence on Desertification
- In the late 1970s a new countervailing historical perspective on the
Sahel's crisis of desertification came from climate historian Sharon Nicholson
who combined the evidence from historical landscape descriptions, modern
climate models, and research on lake levels from Lake Chad to reconstruct
a history of desiccation of the Sahel.
- From this evidence and rainfall data for the past 25 years, it is clear
that the Sahel's climate patterns since 1970 represents the most dramatic
sustained decline in rainfall ever recorded anywhere in the world. The
Lake Chad levels in particular indicate that the late twentieth-century
desiccation is at least as severe as any in the last millennium.
- Climatologist Peter Lamb as early as 1978 had differed with the anthropogenic
(human cause) thesis by pointing out the connection between oceanic conditions
in the Atlantic and African climates.
- In 1991 data from polar-orbiting satellites examined the movements of
Sahelian vegetation over the 1980 to 1990 period in relation to annual
changes in rainfall. This study showed that the Sahara's southern edge
indeed had moved, but that it has fluctuated both north and south depending
on the levels of each year's rainfall. It argued that previous evidence
had been both overly localized and anecdotal.
- This new body of research also supports Lamb's evidence pointing to
a causal effect between lower ocean surface temperatures in the Atlantic
north of the equator and higher ones to the south. There may therefore
be some reason to believe that the Sahel's recent desiccation has been
a product of an overall global warming that has occurred in the second
half of the twentieth century.
- Desertification therefore seems attributable to global climatic processes
more than local human action. From this new perspective, farm-level actions
along the edge of the desert may well be responses to long-term climate
change rather than causes of desert encroachment. In this context a number
of new studies of African land use have offered fresh insights into the
relationship between African peoples, population, and landscapes.
- In other words, the African farmers in "The Desert Doesn't Bloom Here
Anymore" were more likely to be victims of a changing environment rather
than its perpetrators.